Question from Chaim Levin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
BS"D
I'm trying to clarify
why there isn't more outcry over this new "ruling" by the so called
"Safed Rabbinate" to invent a non-existant "get" that
someone classified as a "vegetable" can divorce his wife...
It is clearly
discernable from the Shulchan Aruch Even Haezer 121 that a "shchiv
mera" cannot arrange that a get be given to his wife unless we ascertain
that he was in full faculty of his mental state at the time (also at the time
the get is given).
Reply from Rav Dovid
Eidensohn:
Chaim, very good
question. Let’s first make clear what your question is: A married man became a “vegetable”
and had no normal mental capacity to decide and declare things. His wife was therefore
trapped in a marriage with a vegetable who could never give her a GET
willingly, as he had no capacity to decide to give his wife a GET and to utter
the statements that are required to give one’s wife a GET. And you correctly
quote the Shulchan Aruch Even Hoezer 121 that a GET may only be given when the
husband gives it willingly and says that he wants his wife to be divorced. A
vegetable cannot do this. But an Israeli Beth Din ruled that the woman is free
to remarry, because the husband would surely want his wife to be divorced in
light of his situation. When a senior Israeli rabbinic court decided to
overruled the first Beth Din and declare the GET for a vegetable invalid, a
secular court overruled the religious court and said that the GET was valid,
even though the husband never said one word about giving his wife a GET and had
no mental capacity to even think about doing such a thing.
And Chaim, your point
is “why there isn’t more outcry over this new ruling" is surely a very valid
point. It is not a point against the Beth Din which surely erred in its ruling.
It is a ruling against those of us who were not moved to protest such an
outrage as accepting a divorce from a man who was a vegetable and could not think
or speak those things needed to produce a GET.
As for myself, I feel
the real discussion must be something else: What can we do when there is a
government sponsored rabbonuse where people are free to invent rulings that
produce mamzerim and the secular courts back them so there is no recourse?
In such a case, who
should we attack? The erring Beth Din, or the entire system? And if the entire
system, does that mean we do away with the rabbonuse? If there were reasons to
make an Orthodox rabbonuse, do we now reverse this?
Yes, Chaim, your
question is a good one. But many people are confused. If there is an Orthodox
rabbinate, and if it is under the
control of a secular government, we are inviting the outrage of the Tsevas Beth
Din. So who do we scream at, the Tsevas Beth Din or the secular court that
backed them or the entire structure of an Orthodox Beth Din capable of making
such rulings that are backed by a secular court and a secular government. This
makes for a lot of confusion, and confused people don’t usually sound off when
they don’t know who to complain about.
No comments:
Post a Comment