Profile Rabbi Dovid E. Eidensohn

Thursday, February 7, 2019


The Sedra of Teruma: Kabbala Insights

Dovid Eidensohn

The Sedra of Teruma begins with the vessels of the Beis HaMikdash, surely something of the greatest sanctity. The beginning of the passages there contains, “And they shall make for me a Sanctuary, and I will dwell in their midst.” This is a mighty statement, that HaShem, who lives in the highest heavens, commands us to prepare a Sanctuary where He may shine His holy light among a Sanctuary created by mortals and served by mortals. We know that people are not like angels who have no sense of evil but who devote all of their time to singing songs of glory to Hashem in the highest heavens. People are always doing sins and these sins are incredibly described in the Talmud. And these descriptions are developed in the holy works by the great rabbis. A very strong book on this subject is Mesilas Yeshorim, from one of the greatest Kabbalists, Reb Moshe Chaim Lutsatto zt”l. Who was he?

The Vilna Gaon lived around the time of Reb Moshe Chaim Lutsatto. He said that although he never merited to actually meet Reb Moshe Chaim Lutsatto, if he had realized who he was in time, he would have walked the great distance to his house to merit to talk to him. Why? The Vilna Gaon is known, perhaps uniquely, not so much as Rav Eliyohu which was his name, but as the Gaon, unlikely others of the very great rabbis who are known by their names or books.  Why is this?

In his youth, the Vilna Gaon was already known as a mighty scholar and Kabbalist. As a very young child his father noticed that on Succose he was very happy. The father asked him why he was so happy. He refused to answer. The father then said, “I decree upon you with the authority of a father to tell me why you are so happy.” The young Eliyoho replied, “I was learning in the Succah and Yaacov came and kissed me.”

When Eliyohu matured and became known as a great Torah scholar, the Gadol HaDor, the Shaagas Aryeh, came to Vilna with a question. He had a tradition that a great scholar was in the world and he sought him out. He came to Vilna and went to the rabbi and told him a difficult question. The rabbi could not answer it. The Shaagas Aryeh was then advised to go to Reb Eliyohu. He did and asked him the question and Reb Eliyohu answered immediately. The Shaagas Aryeh declared, “This is a Gaon!”

Just then, the Rov came and heard the question. He, too, replied, the exact answer said by the Vilna Gaon. He then asked the Shaagas Aryeh, “Am I also a Gaon?” The Shaagas Aryeh replied, “A Gaon darf kennen gleich.” (A Gaon must answer immediately.)

The Vilna Gaon once said, “He and I in the revealed Torah. I and he in Kabbala.” Meaning, the Shaagas Aryeh is greater than me in the revealed law. And I am greater than him in Kabbala.” And the Vilna Gaon also said, if he had realized who Reb Moshe Chaim Lutsatto was in time, he would have walked great distance to merit to speak to him.”

My rebbe in this world and the next, the Kabbala Gaon of Jerusalem, wrote eighteen Kabbala books described by the senior Kabbalist Rav Kaduri as surely one who wrote with Ruach HaKodesh. He is always quoting Reb Moshe Chaim Lutsatto and the Vilna Gaon. Their Kabbala is not designed for plain people like me, unless we want to struggle until we get dizzy. But if we plunge into their works, and attempt to penetrate higher worlds, we are not ignored. Let us attempt now to return to Teruma and the Mikdash and the Aron HaKodesh.

HaShem told Moshe, in the discussion about building the Mikdash, about the Aron HaKodesh. He said, “And you shall place into the Aron the Aduse [the Ten Commandments] that I will give you.” That is, HaShem will prepare the Ten Commandments on stone Himself. “And HaShem said to Moshe, ‘Come to Me on the mountain, and I will give you the tables of stone, and the Torah and the mitsvah which I wrote to teach them.’”

Thus, the Tablets and the Mikdash were heavenly lights. The Cohanim were entrusted with care of the Mikdash. But Cohanim were humans and some of them had evil inclinations. Thus we find that in the history of the Beis HaMikdash people often committed great sins. This eventually led to the destruction of the First and Second Temples.

One of the sins was about the Aron which contained the luchose. It was led by two Cohanim who did serious sins. When these Cohanim the sons of Eli the Cohen Gadol sinned in the Temple itself, HaShem punished them with death, and the Jewish people lost a battle with the Pelishtime who then captured the Aron of HaShem. HaShem then unleashed great suffering on the Pelishtime who eventually returned the Aron. But when they did, the Jews who noticed this made jokes.[1] Thus, we see the problems of human beings dealing with HaShem.

And that is a problem central to us all, may we merit to repent. Because although almost all people, even pious, people sin, HaShem made such a world, for two reasons. One, light from darkness is greater than light from light. Therefore, people who are prone to sin and then repent are greater before HaShem than the angels who never sin and their light is less than that of the Jews.

We live in a time predicted in Sota 49 that just prior to the coming of Moshiach, heads of state will become deniers, family will become battlegrounds, but our eternal hope and faith and success is when we turn to HaShem. Yes, even in such a time, when New York State and major countries have turned away from HaShem and family values, those few people who truly trust in HaShem and serve him with penitence, love and fear, merit the highest light.





[1] See Shmuel 1.4

Wednesday, February 6, 2019

President Trump State of the Union attacks aborton


Christopher Halloran / Shutterstock.com

Calvin Freiburger Calvin Freiburger Follow Calvin 

News,

BREAKING: Trump blasts Democrats’ abortion extremism in State of the Union

WASHINGTON, D.C., February 5, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – President Donald Trump used his State of the Union address Tuesday evening to deliver an affirmation of the right to life and a forceful denunciation of recent extreme actions and statements by pro-abortion Democrats in New York and Virginia.
“We meet tonight at a moment of unlimited potential, as we begin a new Congress,” he began his speech, which came a week later than typical as a result of last month’s government shutdown. “Millions of our fellow citizens are watching us, gathered in this great chamber, hoping we will govern not as two parties, but as one nation.”
“We must reject the politics of revenge, resistance and retribution, and embrace the boundless potential of cooperation, compromise, and the common good,” he declared. “We must choose between greatness or gridlock, results or resistance, vision or vengeance, incredible progress or pointless destruction. Tonight, I ask you to choose greatness.”
After honoring several guests including a trio of World War II veterans and astronaut Buzz Aldrin, and discussing issues such as the economy and government regulations, Trump cast partisan obstructionism in Congress as an obstacle to progress. He called for a “new era of cooperation,” starting with “finally confirming the more than 300 highly qualified nominees who are still stuck in the Senate, in some cases years and years waiting.”
Following remarks on illegal immigration, female employment, trade policy, healthcare, and education, the president turned his attention to recent abortion scandals.
“There could be no greater contrast to the beautiful image of a mother holding her infant child than the chilling displays our nation saw in recent days. Lawmakers in New York cheered with delight upon the passage of legislation that would allow a baby to be ripped from the mother's womb moments before birth,” he said. “These are living, feeling, beautiful babies who will never get the chance to share their love and dreams with the world. And then, we had the case of the governor of Virginia where he stated he would execute a baby after birth.”
Trump was referring to video that went viral last week of Democrat Del. Kathy Tran admitting her bill to liberalize Virginia’s late-term abortion laws would allow abortions just as a woman is about to give birth, followed by Democrat Gov. Ralph Northam suggesting that a born-alive “infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired.” He later claimed he was only referring to cases such as a “nonviable pregnancy” or “severe fetal abnormalities.”
Tran’s bill has already been tabled, but the controversy intensified a discussion of the extremes at which Democrats and their allies have arrived on abortion, which was already underway in response to New York’s recently-enacted law declaring a “fundamental right” to abortion and erased the state’s recognition of preborn babies as potential homicide victims.
“To defend the dignity of every person, I am asking Congress to pass legislation to prohibit the late-term abortion of children who can feel pain in the mother's womb,” the president said. “Let us work together to build a culture that cherishes innocent life. And let us reaffirm a fundamental truth: all children—born and unborn—are made in the holy image of God.”
“Once again President Trump has proved he is our nation’s most pro-life president ever and he is keeping his promise to the voters who fueled his victory. The contrast between President Trump’s vision for the future and that of the Democratic Party, now dominated by abortion extremists, is stark,” Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser reacted. “Senate Democrats had the chance yesterday to prove they are not the party of infanticide, and instead they doubled down on a radical agenda of abortion on demand through birth and even beyond. That position that is simply irreconcilable with the values of the American people.
“We ask Congress to heed President Trump’s request, and to send the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act to his desk without delay,” she continued. “This popular, compassionate legislation would protect unborn babies after five months – more than halfway through pregnancy, and a point at least by which these children can feel the pain of abortion.”
It was reported before the address that the president would use it as an opportunity to discuss abortion, a focus NARAL preemptively condemned as a “race to the bottom of their most depraved and devastating ideologies.” Trump reportedly expressed particular disgust for Northam’s infanticide comments Monday evening during a White House briefing with pro-life and pro-family leaders.
As Trump delivered his remarks tonigh, Planned Parenthood president Leana Wen listened in the audience, attending as a guest of Democrat House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Chosen to succeed Cecile Richards partly on the theory that her medical background could help reinforce Planned Parenthood’s narrative that it’s a “healthcare” provider, Wen instead undermined that message last month by admitting the group’s “core mission is providing, protecting and expanding access to abortion and reproductive health care.”

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

A living woman who after a botched abortion was born alive and saved by a nurse and is now 41 years old and fights against the Killers like Cuomo


from LifeSiteNews.com

Abortion survivor: Had I been born in Gov. Northam’s world, I could be dead now



RICHMOND, Virginia, February 5, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – A woman who was born alive after a failed abortion 41 years ago indicated that had she been born under Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam’s proposed abortion regime, she might not have survived. 
“There was an argument as to whether medical care would be provided to me,” said Melissa Ohden in an exclusive video interview with LifeSiteNews.
“I’m that child, that baby that everybody’s talking about,” Ohden said in reference to the national uproar that ensued after Democrat Gov. Northam made comments during a radio interview in support of infanticide last week. 
Northam told a radio show host: "So in this particular example, if the mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen: The infant would be delivered; the infant would be kept comfortable; the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desire, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.” Northam was speaking about a bill introduced by state Delegate Kathy Tran (D), who admitted in a hearing that her bill would allow abortion even at the moment of birth. 
Commented Ohden: “I take Gov. Northam’s words really really seriously.” 
Ohden related how when a saline abortion failed to kill her in 1977, she was “accidentally born alive.” A nurse took pity on her after seeing the 2 lbs. 14 oz baby gasping for breath and brought her to a neonatal ICU where she recovered and survived. 
“There are many stories like mine,” Ohden said. “We’re not talking about hypothetical cases. We’re not talking about ambiguous circumstances. We’re talking about human beings.”
“So as frightening and disgusting as it is to hear these things, I do take hope in the fact that it's not hidden from plain sight anymore. We know what we're dealing with here – and now we can fight," she said. 
Responding to radical abortion laws approved or proposed throughout the country, Ohden said that “it almost feels like we're living in the Twilight Zone. I know I'm not the only one that feels that way.” 
“We live in what I would call a throw-away culture, a throw-away society where the value of life is very subjective,” said Ohden, who added that in such a culture “no one is ever safe.” The standards for the value of life thereby varies. If some people are deemed less valuable than others, Ohden said, “we need to be concerned about that.”
Speaking about the approval of New York’s radical pro-abortion Reproductive Health Act, which repealed requirements for doctors to provide life-saving care to babies born alive, Ohden said that pro-abortion forces have always sought to start momentum for late-term abortion in one state to affect other states. “The fact that it is not being hidden,” she said, “is what’s most surprising.”
Ohden survived a late-term saline infusion abortion at St. Luke’s Hospital in Sioux City, Iowa in 1977. She has testified before the U.S. House of Representatives and the Australian Parliament about abortion and life issues. Formerly an outreach activist with Feminists for Life, she founded the Abortion Survivors Network in 2012. Ohden is also the author of You Carried Me, A Daughter’s Memoir.


Rich fleeing New York, income of state dropping, that is what happens when Cuomo murders babies.


February 4, 2019 | 3:05pm | Updated

Cuomo announces income tax revenues have dropped by $2.3B

MORE ON:




Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced Monday that state income tax revenues plummeted by $2.3 billion since he introduced his new budget plan last month— a bombshell that will force him to curb spending.

Cuomo attributed the revenue drop in December and January largely to the new federal tax code, as well as volatility in the stock market and other uncertainties.

“That’s a $2.3 billion drop in revenues. That’s as serious as a heart attack. This is worse than we had anticipated,” the governor said in Albany.

“This reduction must be addressed in this year’s budget.”

In a rare joint appearance with Cuomo, state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli confirmed the deteriorating finances.

“This is the most serious revenue shock the state has faced in many years,” he said.

He urged Cuomo and the Legislature to sock more money away in the state’s rainy day fund to prepare for the worst.

Cuomo had planned to spend $176 billion — including about $100 billion in federal funds — in the new fiscal year that starts on April 1.

Cuomo’s preliminary analysis claims much of the impact is coming from a drop in revenues from the state’s highest income earners most impacted by the loss of write-offs of state and local tax deductions, known as SALT.

The federal law approved by President Trump and the then-GOP controlled Congress limited SALT deductions to $10,000.

The loss of revenue from New York’s wealthiest puts New York in a bind because the state relies on a progressive income tax system that taxes the rich at a higher rate.

One percent of the state’s top income earners provide 46 percent of the state’s personal income tax revenues, officials said.

Cuomo said Albany can’t go to the well and tax the wealthy again because that would only worsen the situation, citing “anecdotal” evidence that high-income New Yorkers are already fleeing the state to lower-tax jurisdictions.

He offered no figures to back up the claim.

“I don’t believe raising taxes on the rich. That would be the worst thing to do. You would just expand the shortfall,” he said. “God forbid if the rich leave.”




LifeSiteNews on Killing babies Cuomo in NY and others


LifeSiteNews.com Reveals Terror in Abortion Battle and Murdering children in New York and elsewhere – Scandal from a Democrat in Congress in Washington
David Eidensohn
From LifeSite News: Abortion, Politics - U.S.Mon Feb 4, 2019 - 6:56 pm EST
BREAKING: Democrat Patty Murray blocks Senate bill banning infanticide after failed abortions

WASHINGTON, D.C., February 4, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – Sen. Patty Murray, D-WA, blocked the unanimous passage of the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act today, a bill which would have required doctors to provide medical care to babies born alive during failed abortions.
This was a unanimous consent vote, a mechanism under which the bill passes the U.S. Senate if no senator objects and individual senators’ positions are not recorded.
Murray objected to the motion, claiming there are already laws against infanticide.
“This is a gross misinterpretation of the actual language of the bill that is being asked to be considered and, therefore, I object,” said Murray.
After Murray objected to the bill, Sen. Joni Ernst, R-IA, lamented on the Senate floor that this body “can no longer unanimously condemn murder.”
“There is nothing great, there is nothing moral, or even humane about the discussion that we have before us today,” said Ernst. “Over the past week, we have witnessed the absolutely ugly truth about the far-reaching grasp of the abortion industry and its increasingly radicalized political agenda. Politicians have not only defended aborting a child while a woman is in labor, but have gone so far as to support the termination of a child after his or her birth. A child. A baby. Rationality, decency, and basic human compassion have fallen by the wayside.”
Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-KY, called the Act “legislation that ought to be the very definition of something that receives unanimous consent in this body.”
“It’s harrowing that this legislation is even necessary,” said McConnell. “It was even more disturbing when last week, a Democrat Governor was unable to simply state that of course – of course – these newborn babies have human rights that must be respected.”
It’s now up to McConnell to decide whether to force a roll call vote on the anti-infanticide bill at a later date. 
Sen. Ben Sasse, R-NE, brought the measure to the floor after “morally repugnant” comments Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, a Democrat and pediatric neurologist, made last week about infanticide. Sasse suggested after Murray’s objection that he will fight to force a roll call vote on the bill.
Video went viral last week from a subcommittee hearing in which Democrat Del. Kathy Tran takes questions about her bill to repeal regulations on late-term abortions. Republican Del. Todd Gilbert asked how late in the third trimester a physician could perform an abortion and whether that includes when the mother “has physical signs that she is about to give birth.”
“I don't think we have a limit in the bill [...] my bill would allow that, yes,” Tran answered.
Northam then defended Tran’s bill, saying in a radio interview: “So in this particular example, if the mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen: The infant would be delivered; the infant would be kept comfortable; the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desire, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”
He later claimed he was only referring to cases such as a “nonviable pregnancy” or “severe fetal abnormalities.”
Sen. Steve Daines, R-MT, the chair of the new Senate Pro-Life Caucus, read Northam’s comments aloud on the Senate floor today.
“The word ‘evil’ comes to mind,” he said of Northam’s comments. “These comments the governor made pull back the curtain on an extreme and dangerous abortion agenda that shows callous disregard for human life. What the Virginia governor is defending and what these ghoulish abortion-up-to birth laws enable is the free reign of brutal killers like Kermit Gosnell. Babies who survive the violence of an attempted abortion must not be subject to further violence and neglect.”
Northam’s comments “turned the stomachs” of people around the world, Sasse said tonight. He called the Virginia governor a “disgraced coward.”
“Just a few years ago, the abortion lobby was really clear in its talk about hoping abortion would be…safe, legal, and rare,” he continued. “Now we’re talking about keeping the baby comfortable while the doctors have a debate about infanticide.”
“You’re either for babies, or you’re defending infanticide…please, don’t let Governor Northam define you,” Sasse pleaded with his Democrat colleagues.


The bill was co-sponsored by more than three dozen Republican senators.

Sen. Mike Lee, R-UT, shared the story of Gianna Jessen, who survived a late-term saline abortion.
“Triumphantly, defiantly, and against all odds, Gianna Jessen entered this world after her own abortion,” he said.
“Providing life saving care to an infant who survives an abortion is an issue that everyone should be able to agree on but that's not the case in the United States Senate,” said Tony Perkins, President of the Family Research Council. “Senator Murray went to the floor this evening and blocked a vote on legislation that ensures babies born alive after a failed abortion are treated with the equal care given to babies born at the same gestational age.”
He continued, “Infanticide is unacceptable in a civilized society, regardless of what one may think about abortion itself. Whether it's by negligence or with intentionality, the killing of a baby who has been born alive – even if he or she survives an abortion – is abhorrent. This atrocity must stop. America must be better than this.”
‘We’re talking about...infanticide’

On Thursday, Sasse said on the Senate floor, “I’m going to ask all 100 senators to come to the floor and be against infanticide. This shouldn’t be complicated.”
Of Northram’s comments, Sasse said, “Let’s really be clear about what we’re talking about here. We’re talking about fourth-trimester abortion, or what anyone in the normal world calls ‘infanticide.’”
“We're talking about killing a baby that's been born,” he said. “We're not talking about some euphemism, we're not talking about a clump of cells. We're talking about a little baby girl who’s been born and is on a table in a hospital or a medical facility and then a decision or a debate would be had about whether or not you could kill that little baby. We're talking about the most vulnerable among us and we have a public official in America out there again and again defending a practice. This is infanticide that we're talking about. This should be so far beyond any political consideration. We're talking about a little baby. A baby with dignity. An image bearer.”
“Everyone in the Senate ought to be able to say unequivocally that killing that little baby is wrong. This doesn't take any political courage. And, if you can't say that, if there's a member of this body that can't say that, there may be lots of work you can do in the world but you shouldn't be here,” Sasse argued. “There should be no politics here that are right vs. left, or Republican vs. Democrat. This is the most basic thing you could be talking about.”
It is not likely that the House version of the bill would pass in the Democrat-controlled House, if even allowed to be voted on. This is despite the fact that the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, which defines infant survivors of abortion as “human beings” entitled to all the rights in the U.S. Constitution, was passed by both Democrats and Republicans in 2002 and signed into law by then-President George W. Bush. The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would build on that law.
In 2015, only five House Democrats supported the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which then-President Barack Obama said would have a “chilling effect” on “access to care.” 

Monday, February 4, 2019

Rabbi Levin disciple of Rav Avigder Miller Battles here with Yechiel Kalish of Agudas Israel who backs gays and abortion disgracing Agudah and himself


Rabbi Yehuda Levin Fighter for Morality

For forty years Rabbi Levin has been battling immorality. He has appeared several times on the front page of the New York Times and has met with Popes. Today he is battling General Cuomo who has reversed previous protections for women in the destruction of a fetus against the will of the mother and other hideous changes. He has extensive exposure on radio, video and is a major speaker and debates those opposed to heaven and family.

Inserted by Dovid Eidensohn

Rabbi Levin in article from Jewish Press on Kalish who backs gay marriage and abortion

Illinois State Capitol in Springfield

“I’m proud to have been one of the foot soldiers…to protect a woman’s right to choose…. It’s clear that Roe [v. Wade] is at risk from Donald Trump’s Supreme Court appointees.”

“Protecting access to safe and legal reproductive healthcare …is a priority for me because a woman’s right to choose is under assault from Washington.”
“Equality for all citizens is a fundamental constitutional and moral principle. We are all equal under the eyes of the law and G-d, and marriage equality is no exception, and that’s why I support [gay marriage].”

Who made these statements? A liberal atheist? A graduate of Chovevei Torah?
No. According to the Chicago Tribune, they come from the mouth of the newest member of Illinois’ General Assembly, Rabbi Yechiel “Mark” Kalish, formerly national director of government affairs for Agudath Israel and currently a member of its board of trustees.

In a private e-mail to supporters, Kalish denied making these statements. Yet, a week has passed since the article’s publication, and he still has not publicly repudiated them. In other words, for an entire week, he has let the public believe that an Orthodox rabbi can celebrate gay marriage and abortion-on-demand. Doesn’t he care about the Chillul Hashem he is causing?
Moreover, the Chicago Tribune is hardly the only outlet to have reported that Kalish holds liberal social views. In a Chicago Sun Times article that Kalish proudly tweeted, he is quoted as saying, “As it relates to issues that may come up in the Legislature, I will support the law of the land. And if the law of the land is Roe v. Wade, I will support Roe v. Wade.”

That same article quotes former Rep. Lou Lang – who chose Kalish to replace him in Illinois’ General Assembly after he resigned – as saying, “Just because he’s a rabbi and just because he works for an organization that is pretty conservative does not mean that he is not personally progressive. I would never, ever appoint somebody to replace me that didn’t share my values.”

What that means, reported Politico, is that: “‘Yes,’ [Kalish is] pro-choice. ‘Yes,’ he supports gay marriage.” As Kalish reportedly told Lang, “The voters of [Illinois’] 16th District won’t notice a difference in my voting record compared to yours.”

Is Kalish now claiming the Tribune, the Sun Times, and Politico are all lying? And was the Chicago Tribune also lying when it reported that he attended the governor’s celebration of the 45th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that has resulted in the deaths of 60 million babies?

Considering the damage he’s done and the lack of judgment he’s shown, the only way forward for Kalish is to apologize, recant, and resign. Additionally – due to Kalish’s close association with Agudath Israel – members of that organization’s Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah need to clearly state that they absolutely oppose gay marriage and abortion on demand. Dare we remain silent when 83 percent of Americans in a recent poll agreed that there should be restrictions on obtaining an abortion?

A Tanzanian cardinal recently urged his government to refuse huge food shipments for his country’s hunger-stricken population if accepting it would mean decriminalizing homosexual behavior. Dare we be less principled than this righteous gentile?

Agudah needs to speak out on other issues as well. Where was it, for example, when pro-transgender legislation passed in New York two weeks ago? Why did it say nothing when Assemblyman Daniel Rosenthal and Steven Cymbrowitz voted for this bill as well as Gov. Cuomo’s radical abortion bill that, among other things, permits withholding lifesaving treatment for a baby that survives a botched abortion?
The homosexual lobby would never be so cavalier about its agenda. Can we be cavalier when it comes to the Torah’s agenda? Henceforth, Agudah must reassure us that it will only act in political circles based on the guidelines of gedolim. We need to read a series of in-depth articles and guidelines written personally by Rav Shmuel Kamenetsky, Rav Aharon Feldman, Rav Elya Brudny, and other rabbanim with Torah sources on voting for immoral legislation and relating to politicians who champion it.
Our community is starving for strong leadership. It wants uncompromising moral leadership that will serve as a beacon for millions of pro-family Americans who wish to keep this country anchored to its biblical foundations. We – the am hanivchar – cannot be AWOL when moral values that haven’t been challenged since pagan times are under attack. Believing Christians are fighting. Where are we?

A Forced GET makes a mamzer if the wife remarries with it, but what if the husband has a doubt about giving the GET is it a doubtful mamzer?


One may not Force a GET

Dovid Eidensohn



This is the opinion of the Shulchan Aruch Even Hoezer 77.2 quoting the Rashbo in VII.414 “It is forbidden to force a GET. If the husband wants to, he divorces her. If he doesn’t want to, he doesn”t.

 All of the commentators there forbid forcing a GET. However, the Gro there brings that those who forbid forcing a GET are the Rosh, the Rashbo, the Ran,S and the Ritva. He says further that although Rambam and Rashbam disagree with this, this is this halocho that forcing a GET is wrong. Rambam in the very beginning of laws of Divorce says that the Torah requires a willing GET given by the husband or the GET is worthless. If so, those who forbid forcing a GET mean that the child born from a woman who is divorced by a forced GET, are mamzerim.

Note that the Gro says that Rashbam and Rambam disagree and would allow a husband to be forced to divorce his wife. But the Rambam on that subject does not say this. He says rather that if a woman does not ask for a GET but stays in the house and takes care of the children doing basic housework, but denies the husband marital intimacy, we force a GET, on the condition that Beth Din gives the husband time to straighten out his marriage. If he fails after the stipulated time to do this, we force a GET. But if she demands a GET, there is an open Mishneh in Nedorim 90b that we do not trust a woman these days to force a GET, they were trusted in earlier times, but today women learned to lie about their husbands to get a GET so today we don’t believe them anymore. The Vilna Gaon brings this from a Tosfose in Kesubose 63b a lengthy Tosfose where Rabbeinu Tam forbids forcing a GET but some other such as Rashbam permitted it. The question it:

What does Rashbam do with the Mishneh which is not contradicted anywhere? The same question can be asked of the Modern Orthodox who created an obligation on all husbands to pay their wives $150 a day for each day after he denied he a GET. What do they do with the Mishneh that today and for hundreds of years since the Mishneh in Nedarim, we don’t allow a woman to force a GET?

Perhaps Rashbam holds like the Rambam, that we can force a GET if the women is against her husband having marital relations with her but stays in the house and takes care of the children. If she doesn’t mention asking for a GET the Mishneh does not apply, at least according to the Rambam. Rashbam could agree. But if she asks for a GET Rambam could also agree with the Mishneh that she has no right to force a GET.

Be advised also that a mamzer is a terrible thing. But worse than a mamzer is a doubtful mamzer. A mamzer may marry a mamzeres. But a doubtful mamzer may not marry a mamzeres and may not marry a Jewish woman.

A doubtful mamzer is discussed in Shulchan Aruch Even Hoezer 4:24.  A doubtful mamzer is described as a man who marries a woman who is possibly married to another man. If she is really married to him and he has a baby from her, the baby is a mamzer. But if there is a doubt if she is married to that other man, a child born from her is a doubtful mamzer.

I had a question as follows: A husband is being forced terribly to divorce his wife so that he just can’t take it any more. So he gives the GET with bitterness as he is absolutely opposed to being forced. But when he comes to give the GET he realizes that if the GET is worthless, his wife cannot remarry, but, he also cannot remarry, because he never divorced his wife. If so, and if he thinks this way, and has a doubt if he really wants to divorce his wife, and especially if he revealed his thoughts to people so that somebody would marry him with no fear, the GET is probably good. Because a forced GET when we know the husband accepts it is probably kosher. But what if we don’t have two witnesses to this, maybe one witness, or maybe people spoke to the husband and know that he was afraid of not being able to remarry and may have decided to make a kosher GET maybe not. Does that make the child a doubtful mamzer that he cannot marry a mamzeres or a Jewish woman?



Senior Agudah Apikorsim

Dovid Eidensohn

Why I Don’t Recognize Agudas Israel of America

In a previous article on my blog torahhalacha.blogspot.com and elsewhere, I strongly attacked Agudas Israel for two reasons. One, in 1996 two senior rabbis of the Kasho Jewish community commanded me to run for Country Executive, not to win which they did not want, but to fight gays. I received a blessing to succeed in my task from a senior rabbi who just passed away, and entered the fray against a Republican and Democratic candidate. On June 26, 1996 the Journal News newspaper of Lohud, prominent throughout New York, wrote me up on page one with large letters and my picture: Rabbi attacks gay lobby calls it an army of hate. From then on for months I was called for my comments on various matters, including how to fix up a traffic problem. I then called up two major Rosh Yeshivas of Agudas Israel and asked them to help with the war against gays. They both replied with the following words: “You may not fight gays.  To fight gays is an act of hate.” What do they do with the pesukim in Vayikro 18:22 and 20:13 that sodomy is a capital crime? They don’t believe in it. They prefer money from the politicians who back gays. From this I realized that the Chofetz Chaim was no longer in charge of Agudas Israel. These believers that to fight gays is hate and against the Torah are apikorsim.

Recently we had a reply of this even worse. A prominent rabbi who did much to spread Torah and achieved high positions in Agudas Israel of America, was given the choice of succeeding a retiring Assemblyman in the state of Illinois. Yechiel Kalish accepted on the condition that he back gays and other positions of the ultra-liberal retiring Assemblyman. This was backed and not criticized by anyone in the Agudah. I made increasing phone calls for days to the top people of the Agudah including the one who wrote warmly about Kalish, and left emails and phone messages why I was calling, to find out if the Agudah has officially turned away from the Torah to violate passages that Jews recite from the Torah on Yom Kippur. Nobody answered the phone, despite that many people assured me they would return my phone call.

Finally, I called again and got one person very high up in the Agudah and a warm friend of mine in previous years. I explained about Kalish and he said that he spoke to him but that Kalish told him that he had made a mistake and indicated that the Agudah should accept this. I asked the prominent person if he would publicize what he heard from Kalish and he said no because that would make a Chilul HaShem. In other words, if the Agudah ever makes a mistake and the whole world knows about it because it is all of the newspapers, the Agudah must pretend that it never happened.

My response to this and my experience with the Agudah as mentioned before going back many years to 1996 was that not publicizing people who lie about violating the Torah is itself the worst Chilul HaShem. Even though everybody knows that Kalish took the job as Assemblyman only because he had to vote for gays and other anti-Torah things. He had to commit to follow in the path of the Assemblyman who just resigned and had the legal right to appoint the successor.

I myself got a phone call from Kalish and he spoke very nicely to me, not knowing why I asked his office to have him call me. When he began to realize that I was not in his district he began to speak differently especially when I broached the question about backing gays. I understood from him that he does back gays. And if he knows, as I know, that the Agudah has refused to confront him on this other than the one person who asked him and got a lie about his changing his promise, we have no choice but to fault the entire Agudah of the Chofetz Chaim for its silence on Kalish. Of course, the senior Rosh Yeshivas from 1996 who disagreed with two pesukim in Vayikro that sodomo was a capital crime are apikorsim.

Where is the Chofetz Chaim? And why do we fling our criticism at the Agudah alone, when so many people who are Torah Jews refuse to publicly protest the New York State GET Law which allows a forced GET that produces many mamzerim? And why do so very few people protest when  Moshe Heinemann who studied under Reb Aharon Kotler, announceson the Internet that everyone should give money to the organization ORA which has already freed 140 women with forced Gittin from their husband. That produces mamzerim when the woman remarries. And why when Cuomo’s new Democratic government passes new laws on abortion and fetuses that remove the crime of poisoning a woman who wants her baby by poisoning her so that he child dies are so many Torah Jews silent? New York State no longer thinks that a crime of murdering a fetus just about to be born is wrong.

The gemora in Shabbos says that anyone who knows about sins that othera do and is silent, is punished for those peoples’ sins. What hope is there for everybody today?

I know a few people, some of them without money, some of them with health and other problems, who are battling Cuomo tooth and nail. What about the rest of us?