Profile Rabbi Dovid E. Eidensohn

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

A living woman who after a botched abortion was born alive and saved by a nurse and is now 41 years old and fights against the Killers like Cuomo


from LifeSiteNews.com

Abortion survivor: Had I been born in Gov. Northam’s world, I could be dead now



RICHMOND, Virginia, February 5, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – A woman who was born alive after a failed abortion 41 years ago indicated that had she been born under Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam’s proposed abortion regime, she might not have survived. 
“There was an argument as to whether medical care would be provided to me,” said Melissa Ohden in an exclusive video interview with LifeSiteNews.
“I’m that child, that baby that everybody’s talking about,” Ohden said in reference to the national uproar that ensued after Democrat Gov. Northam made comments during a radio interview in support of infanticide last week. 
Northam told a radio show host: "So in this particular example, if the mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen: The infant would be delivered; the infant would be kept comfortable; the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desire, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.” Northam was speaking about a bill introduced by state Delegate Kathy Tran (D), who admitted in a hearing that her bill would allow abortion even at the moment of birth. 
Commented Ohden: “I take Gov. Northam’s words really really seriously.” 
Ohden related how when a saline abortion failed to kill her in 1977, she was “accidentally born alive.” A nurse took pity on her after seeing the 2 lbs. 14 oz baby gasping for breath and brought her to a neonatal ICU where she recovered and survived. 
“There are many stories like mine,” Ohden said. “We’re not talking about hypothetical cases. We’re not talking about ambiguous circumstances. We’re talking about human beings.”
“So as frightening and disgusting as it is to hear these things, I do take hope in the fact that it's not hidden from plain sight anymore. We know what we're dealing with here – and now we can fight," she said. 
Responding to radical abortion laws approved or proposed throughout the country, Ohden said that “it almost feels like we're living in the Twilight Zone. I know I'm not the only one that feels that way.” 
“We live in what I would call a throw-away culture, a throw-away society where the value of life is very subjective,” said Ohden, who added that in such a culture “no one is ever safe.” The standards for the value of life thereby varies. If some people are deemed less valuable than others, Ohden said, “we need to be concerned about that.”
Speaking about the approval of New York’s radical pro-abortion Reproductive Health Act, which repealed requirements for doctors to provide life-saving care to babies born alive, Ohden said that pro-abortion forces have always sought to start momentum for late-term abortion in one state to affect other states. “The fact that it is not being hidden,” she said, “is what’s most surprising.”
Ohden survived a late-term saline infusion abortion at St. Luke’s Hospital in Sioux City, Iowa in 1977. She has testified before the U.S. House of Representatives and the Australian Parliament about abortion and life issues. Formerly an outreach activist with Feminists for Life, she founded the Abortion Survivors Network in 2012. Ohden is also the author of You Carried Me, A Daughter’s Memoir.


Rich fleeing New York, income of state dropping, that is what happens when Cuomo murders babies.


February 4, 2019 | 3:05pm | Updated

Cuomo announces income tax revenues have dropped by $2.3B

MORE ON:




Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced Monday that state income tax revenues plummeted by $2.3 billion since he introduced his new budget plan last month— a bombshell that will force him to curb spending.

Cuomo attributed the revenue drop in December and January largely to the new federal tax code, as well as volatility in the stock market and other uncertainties.

“That’s a $2.3 billion drop in revenues. That’s as serious as a heart attack. This is worse than we had anticipated,” the governor said in Albany.

“This reduction must be addressed in this year’s budget.”

In a rare joint appearance with Cuomo, state Comptroller Tom DiNapoli confirmed the deteriorating finances.

“This is the most serious revenue shock the state has faced in many years,” he said.

He urged Cuomo and the Legislature to sock more money away in the state’s rainy day fund to prepare for the worst.

Cuomo had planned to spend $176 billion — including about $100 billion in federal funds — in the new fiscal year that starts on April 1.

Cuomo’s preliminary analysis claims much of the impact is coming from a drop in revenues from the state’s highest income earners most impacted by the loss of write-offs of state and local tax deductions, known as SALT.

The federal law approved by President Trump and the then-GOP controlled Congress limited SALT deductions to $10,000.

The loss of revenue from New York’s wealthiest puts New York in a bind because the state relies on a progressive income tax system that taxes the rich at a higher rate.

One percent of the state’s top income earners provide 46 percent of the state’s personal income tax revenues, officials said.

Cuomo said Albany can’t go to the well and tax the wealthy again because that would only worsen the situation, citing “anecdotal” evidence that high-income New Yorkers are already fleeing the state to lower-tax jurisdictions.

He offered no figures to back up the claim.

“I don’t believe raising taxes on the rich. That would be the worst thing to do. You would just expand the shortfall,” he said. “God forbid if the rich leave.”




LifeSiteNews on Killing babies Cuomo in NY and others


LifeSiteNews.com Reveals Terror in Abortion Battle and Murdering children in New York and elsewhere – Scandal from a Democrat in Congress in Washington
David Eidensohn
From LifeSite News: Abortion, Politics - U.S.Mon Feb 4, 2019 - 6:56 pm EST
BREAKING: Democrat Patty Murray blocks Senate bill banning infanticide after failed abortions

WASHINGTON, D.C., February 4, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – Sen. Patty Murray, D-WA, blocked the unanimous passage of the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act today, a bill which would have required doctors to provide medical care to babies born alive during failed abortions.
This was a unanimous consent vote, a mechanism under which the bill passes the U.S. Senate if no senator objects and individual senators’ positions are not recorded.
Murray objected to the motion, claiming there are already laws against infanticide.
“This is a gross misinterpretation of the actual language of the bill that is being asked to be considered and, therefore, I object,” said Murray.
After Murray objected to the bill, Sen. Joni Ernst, R-IA, lamented on the Senate floor that this body “can no longer unanimously condemn murder.”
“There is nothing great, there is nothing moral, or even humane about the discussion that we have before us today,” said Ernst. “Over the past week, we have witnessed the absolutely ugly truth about the far-reaching grasp of the abortion industry and its increasingly radicalized political agenda. Politicians have not only defended aborting a child while a woman is in labor, but have gone so far as to support the termination of a child after his or her birth. A child. A baby. Rationality, decency, and basic human compassion have fallen by the wayside.”
Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-KY, called the Act “legislation that ought to be the very definition of something that receives unanimous consent in this body.”
“It’s harrowing that this legislation is even necessary,” said McConnell. “It was even more disturbing when last week, a Democrat Governor was unable to simply state that of course – of course – these newborn babies have human rights that must be respected.”
It’s now up to McConnell to decide whether to force a roll call vote on the anti-infanticide bill at a later date. 
Sen. Ben Sasse, R-NE, brought the measure to the floor after “morally repugnant” comments Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam, a Democrat and pediatric neurologist, made last week about infanticide. Sasse suggested after Murray’s objection that he will fight to force a roll call vote on the bill.
Video went viral last week from a subcommittee hearing in which Democrat Del. Kathy Tran takes questions about her bill to repeal regulations on late-term abortions. Republican Del. Todd Gilbert asked how late in the third trimester a physician could perform an abortion and whether that includes when the mother “has physical signs that she is about to give birth.”
“I don't think we have a limit in the bill [...] my bill would allow that, yes,” Tran answered.
Northam then defended Tran’s bill, saying in a radio interview: “So in this particular example, if the mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen: The infant would be delivered; the infant would be kept comfortable; the infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desire, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”
He later claimed he was only referring to cases such as a “nonviable pregnancy” or “severe fetal abnormalities.”
Sen. Steve Daines, R-MT, the chair of the new Senate Pro-Life Caucus, read Northam’s comments aloud on the Senate floor today.
“The word ‘evil’ comes to mind,” he said of Northam’s comments. “These comments the governor made pull back the curtain on an extreme and dangerous abortion agenda that shows callous disregard for human life. What the Virginia governor is defending and what these ghoulish abortion-up-to birth laws enable is the free reign of brutal killers like Kermit Gosnell. Babies who survive the violence of an attempted abortion must not be subject to further violence and neglect.”
Northam’s comments “turned the stomachs” of people around the world, Sasse said tonight. He called the Virginia governor a “disgraced coward.”
“Just a few years ago, the abortion lobby was really clear in its talk about hoping abortion would be…safe, legal, and rare,” he continued. “Now we’re talking about keeping the baby comfortable while the doctors have a debate about infanticide.”
“You’re either for babies, or you’re defending infanticide…please, don’t let Governor Northam define you,” Sasse pleaded with his Democrat colleagues.


The bill was co-sponsored by more than three dozen Republican senators.

Sen. Mike Lee, R-UT, shared the story of Gianna Jessen, who survived a late-term saline abortion.
“Triumphantly, defiantly, and against all odds, Gianna Jessen entered this world after her own abortion,” he said.
“Providing life saving care to an infant who survives an abortion is an issue that everyone should be able to agree on but that's not the case in the United States Senate,” said Tony Perkins, President of the Family Research Council. “Senator Murray went to the floor this evening and blocked a vote on legislation that ensures babies born alive after a failed abortion are treated with the equal care given to babies born at the same gestational age.”
He continued, “Infanticide is unacceptable in a civilized society, regardless of what one may think about abortion itself. Whether it's by negligence or with intentionality, the killing of a baby who has been born alive – even if he or she survives an abortion – is abhorrent. This atrocity must stop. America must be better than this.”
‘We’re talking about...infanticide’

On Thursday, Sasse said on the Senate floor, “I’m going to ask all 100 senators to come to the floor and be against infanticide. This shouldn’t be complicated.”
Of Northram’s comments, Sasse said, “Let’s really be clear about what we’re talking about here. We’re talking about fourth-trimester abortion, or what anyone in the normal world calls ‘infanticide.’”
“We're talking about killing a baby that's been born,” he said. “We're not talking about some euphemism, we're not talking about a clump of cells. We're talking about a little baby girl who’s been born and is on a table in a hospital or a medical facility and then a decision or a debate would be had about whether or not you could kill that little baby. We're talking about the most vulnerable among us and we have a public official in America out there again and again defending a practice. This is infanticide that we're talking about. This should be so far beyond any political consideration. We're talking about a little baby. A baby with dignity. An image bearer.”
“Everyone in the Senate ought to be able to say unequivocally that killing that little baby is wrong. This doesn't take any political courage. And, if you can't say that, if there's a member of this body that can't say that, there may be lots of work you can do in the world but you shouldn't be here,” Sasse argued. “There should be no politics here that are right vs. left, or Republican vs. Democrat. This is the most basic thing you could be talking about.”
It is not likely that the House version of the bill would pass in the Democrat-controlled House, if even allowed to be voted on. This is despite the fact that the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, which defines infant survivors of abortion as “human beings” entitled to all the rights in the U.S. Constitution, was passed by both Democrats and Republicans in 2002 and signed into law by then-President George W. Bush. The Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act would build on that law.
In 2015, only five House Democrats supported the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, which then-President Barack Obama said would have a “chilling effect” on “access to care.” 

Monday, February 4, 2019

Rabbi Levin disciple of Rav Avigder Miller Battles here with Yechiel Kalish of Agudas Israel who backs gays and abortion disgracing Agudah and himself


Rabbi Yehuda Levin Fighter for Morality

For forty years Rabbi Levin has been battling immorality. He has appeared several times on the front page of the New York Times and has met with Popes. Today he is battling General Cuomo who has reversed previous protections for women in the destruction of a fetus against the will of the mother and other hideous changes. He has extensive exposure on radio, video and is a major speaker and debates those opposed to heaven and family.

Inserted by Dovid Eidensohn

Rabbi Levin in article from Jewish Press on Kalish who backs gay marriage and abortion

Illinois State Capitol in Springfield

“I’m proud to have been one of the foot soldiers…to protect a woman’s right to choose…. It’s clear that Roe [v. Wade] is at risk from Donald Trump’s Supreme Court appointees.”

“Protecting access to safe and legal reproductive healthcare …is a priority for me because a woman’s right to choose is under assault from Washington.”
“Equality for all citizens is a fundamental constitutional and moral principle. We are all equal under the eyes of the law and G-d, and marriage equality is no exception, and that’s why I support [gay marriage].”

Who made these statements? A liberal atheist? A graduate of Chovevei Torah?
No. According to the Chicago Tribune, they come from the mouth of the newest member of Illinois’ General Assembly, Rabbi Yechiel “Mark” Kalish, formerly national director of government affairs for Agudath Israel and currently a member of its board of trustees.

In a private e-mail to supporters, Kalish denied making these statements. Yet, a week has passed since the article’s publication, and he still has not publicly repudiated them. In other words, for an entire week, he has let the public believe that an Orthodox rabbi can celebrate gay marriage and abortion-on-demand. Doesn’t he care about the Chillul Hashem he is causing?
Moreover, the Chicago Tribune is hardly the only outlet to have reported that Kalish holds liberal social views. In a Chicago Sun Times article that Kalish proudly tweeted, he is quoted as saying, “As it relates to issues that may come up in the Legislature, I will support the law of the land. And if the law of the land is Roe v. Wade, I will support Roe v. Wade.”

That same article quotes former Rep. Lou Lang – who chose Kalish to replace him in Illinois’ General Assembly after he resigned – as saying, “Just because he’s a rabbi and just because he works for an organization that is pretty conservative does not mean that he is not personally progressive. I would never, ever appoint somebody to replace me that didn’t share my values.”

What that means, reported Politico, is that: “‘Yes,’ [Kalish is] pro-choice. ‘Yes,’ he supports gay marriage.” As Kalish reportedly told Lang, “The voters of [Illinois’] 16th District won’t notice a difference in my voting record compared to yours.”

Is Kalish now claiming the Tribune, the Sun Times, and Politico are all lying? And was the Chicago Tribune also lying when it reported that he attended the governor’s celebration of the 45th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision that has resulted in the deaths of 60 million babies?

Considering the damage he’s done and the lack of judgment he’s shown, the only way forward for Kalish is to apologize, recant, and resign. Additionally – due to Kalish’s close association with Agudath Israel – members of that organization’s Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah need to clearly state that they absolutely oppose gay marriage and abortion on demand. Dare we remain silent when 83 percent of Americans in a recent poll agreed that there should be restrictions on obtaining an abortion?

A Tanzanian cardinal recently urged his government to refuse huge food shipments for his country’s hunger-stricken population if accepting it would mean decriminalizing homosexual behavior. Dare we be less principled than this righteous gentile?

Agudah needs to speak out on other issues as well. Where was it, for example, when pro-transgender legislation passed in New York two weeks ago? Why did it say nothing when Assemblyman Daniel Rosenthal and Steven Cymbrowitz voted for this bill as well as Gov. Cuomo’s radical abortion bill that, among other things, permits withholding lifesaving treatment for a baby that survives a botched abortion?
The homosexual lobby would never be so cavalier about its agenda. Can we be cavalier when it comes to the Torah’s agenda? Henceforth, Agudah must reassure us that it will only act in political circles based on the guidelines of gedolim. We need to read a series of in-depth articles and guidelines written personally by Rav Shmuel Kamenetsky, Rav Aharon Feldman, Rav Elya Brudny, and other rabbanim with Torah sources on voting for immoral legislation and relating to politicians who champion it.
Our community is starving for strong leadership. It wants uncompromising moral leadership that will serve as a beacon for millions of pro-family Americans who wish to keep this country anchored to its biblical foundations. We – the am hanivchar – cannot be AWOL when moral values that haven’t been challenged since pagan times are under attack. Believing Christians are fighting. Where are we?

A Forced GET makes a mamzer if the wife remarries with it, but what if the husband has a doubt about giving the GET is it a doubtful mamzer?


One may not Force a GET

Dovid Eidensohn



This is the opinion of the Shulchan Aruch Even Hoezer 77.2 quoting the Rashbo in VII.414 “It is forbidden to force a GET. If the husband wants to, he divorces her. If he doesn’t want to, he doesn”t.

 All of the commentators there forbid forcing a GET. However, the Gro there brings that those who forbid forcing a GET are the Rosh, the Rashbo, the Ran,S and the Ritva. He says further that although Rambam and Rashbam disagree with this, this is this halocho that forcing a GET is wrong. Rambam in the very beginning of laws of Divorce says that the Torah requires a willing GET given by the husband or the GET is worthless. If so, those who forbid forcing a GET mean that the child born from a woman who is divorced by a forced GET, are mamzerim.

Note that the Gro says that Rashbam and Rambam disagree and would allow a husband to be forced to divorce his wife. But the Rambam on that subject does not say this. He says rather that if a woman does not ask for a GET but stays in the house and takes care of the children doing basic housework, but denies the husband marital intimacy, we force a GET, on the condition that Beth Din gives the husband time to straighten out his marriage. If he fails after the stipulated time to do this, we force a GET. But if she demands a GET, there is an open Mishneh in Nedorim 90b that we do not trust a woman these days to force a GET, they were trusted in earlier times, but today women learned to lie about their husbands to get a GET so today we don’t believe them anymore. The Vilna Gaon brings this from a Tosfose in Kesubose 63b a lengthy Tosfose where Rabbeinu Tam forbids forcing a GET but some other such as Rashbam permitted it. The question it:

What does Rashbam do with the Mishneh which is not contradicted anywhere? The same question can be asked of the Modern Orthodox who created an obligation on all husbands to pay their wives $150 a day for each day after he denied he a GET. What do they do with the Mishneh that today and for hundreds of years since the Mishneh in Nedarim, we don’t allow a woman to force a GET?

Perhaps Rashbam holds like the Rambam, that we can force a GET if the women is against her husband having marital relations with her but stays in the house and takes care of the children. If she doesn’t mention asking for a GET the Mishneh does not apply, at least according to the Rambam. Rashbam could agree. But if she asks for a GET Rambam could also agree with the Mishneh that she has no right to force a GET.

Be advised also that a mamzer is a terrible thing. But worse than a mamzer is a doubtful mamzer. A mamzer may marry a mamzeres. But a doubtful mamzer may not marry a mamzeres and may not marry a Jewish woman.

A doubtful mamzer is discussed in Shulchan Aruch Even Hoezer 4:24.  A doubtful mamzer is described as a man who marries a woman who is possibly married to another man. If she is really married to him and he has a baby from her, the baby is a mamzer. But if there is a doubt if she is married to that other man, a child born from her is a doubtful mamzer.

I had a question as follows: A husband is being forced terribly to divorce his wife so that he just can’t take it any more. So he gives the GET with bitterness as he is absolutely opposed to being forced. But when he comes to give the GET he realizes that if the GET is worthless, his wife cannot remarry, but, he also cannot remarry, because he never divorced his wife. If so, and if he thinks this way, and has a doubt if he really wants to divorce his wife, and especially if he revealed his thoughts to people so that somebody would marry him with no fear, the GET is probably good. Because a forced GET when we know the husband accepts it is probably kosher. But what if we don’t have two witnesses to this, maybe one witness, or maybe people spoke to the husband and know that he was afraid of not being able to remarry and may have decided to make a kosher GET maybe not. Does that make the child a doubtful mamzer that he cannot marry a mamzeres or a Jewish woman?



Senior Agudah Apikorsim

Dovid Eidensohn

Why I Don’t Recognize Agudas Israel of America

In a previous article on my blog torahhalacha.blogspot.com and elsewhere, I strongly attacked Agudas Israel for two reasons. One, in 1996 two senior rabbis of the Kasho Jewish community commanded me to run for Country Executive, not to win which they did not want, but to fight gays. I received a blessing to succeed in my task from a senior rabbi who just passed away, and entered the fray against a Republican and Democratic candidate. On June 26, 1996 the Journal News newspaper of Lohud, prominent throughout New York, wrote me up on page one with large letters and my picture: Rabbi attacks gay lobby calls it an army of hate. From then on for months I was called for my comments on various matters, including how to fix up a traffic problem. I then called up two major Rosh Yeshivas of Agudas Israel and asked them to help with the war against gays. They both replied with the following words: “You may not fight gays.  To fight gays is an act of hate.” What do they do with the pesukim in Vayikro 18:22 and 20:13 that sodomy is a capital crime? They don’t believe in it. They prefer money from the politicians who back gays. From this I realized that the Chofetz Chaim was no longer in charge of Agudas Israel. These believers that to fight gays is hate and against the Torah are apikorsim.

Recently we had a reply of this even worse. A prominent rabbi who did much to spread Torah and achieved high positions in Agudas Israel of America, was given the choice of succeeding a retiring Assemblyman in the state of Illinois. Yechiel Kalish accepted on the condition that he back gays and other positions of the ultra-liberal retiring Assemblyman. This was backed and not criticized by anyone in the Agudah. I made increasing phone calls for days to the top people of the Agudah including the one who wrote warmly about Kalish, and left emails and phone messages why I was calling, to find out if the Agudah has officially turned away from the Torah to violate passages that Jews recite from the Torah on Yom Kippur. Nobody answered the phone, despite that many people assured me they would return my phone call.

Finally, I called again and got one person very high up in the Agudah and a warm friend of mine in previous years. I explained about Kalish and he said that he spoke to him but that Kalish told him that he had made a mistake and indicated that the Agudah should accept this. I asked the prominent person if he would publicize what he heard from Kalish and he said no because that would make a Chilul HaShem. In other words, if the Agudah ever makes a mistake and the whole world knows about it because it is all of the newspapers, the Agudah must pretend that it never happened.

My response to this and my experience with the Agudah as mentioned before going back many years to 1996 was that not publicizing people who lie about violating the Torah is itself the worst Chilul HaShem. Even though everybody knows that Kalish took the job as Assemblyman only because he had to vote for gays and other anti-Torah things. He had to commit to follow in the path of the Assemblyman who just resigned and had the legal right to appoint the successor.

I myself got a phone call from Kalish and he spoke very nicely to me, not knowing why I asked his office to have him call me. When he began to realize that I was not in his district he began to speak differently especially when I broached the question about backing gays. I understood from him that he does back gays. And if he knows, as I know, that the Agudah has refused to confront him on this other than the one person who asked him and got a lie about his changing his promise, we have no choice but to fault the entire Agudah of the Chofetz Chaim for its silence on Kalish. Of course, the senior Rosh Yeshivas from 1996 who disagreed with two pesukim in Vayikro that sodomo was a capital crime are apikorsim.

Where is the Chofetz Chaim? And why do we fling our criticism at the Agudah alone, when so many people who are Torah Jews refuse to publicly protest the New York State GET Law which allows a forced GET that produces many mamzerim? And why do so very few people protest when  Moshe Heinemann who studied under Reb Aharon Kotler, announceson the Internet that everyone should give money to the organization ORA which has already freed 140 women with forced Gittin from their husband. That produces mamzerim when the woman remarries. And why when Cuomo’s new Democratic government passes new laws on abortion and fetuses that remove the crime of poisoning a woman who wants her baby by poisoning her so that he child dies are so many Torah Jews silent? New York State no longer thinks that a crime of murdering a fetus just about to be born is wrong.

The gemora in Shabbos says that anyone who knows about sins that othera do and is silent, is punished for those peoples’ sins. What hope is there for everybody today?

I know a few people, some of them without money, some of them with health and other problems, who are battling Cuomo tooth and nail. What about the rest of us?




Kabbala and Living in a Dark World


A person who commits a capital crime that requires death is only punished this way if he was warned and violated the warning and if the warning was done by two male kosher religious witnesses. What, therefore, is the status of a husband who qualifies either for a beating to divorce his wife or for a humiliation for committing a sin? Does he also require a warning from two kosher witnesses and does he too have to defy the warning that he will be punished for that or not?

A more difficult question is as follows. If a person lives among deeply religious people and defies the Sabbath, we understand that he, if warned and violates the warning, deserves his fate. What, however, happens when a person lives in a time where everybody is not religious, or many people are not religious, and this person comes from a family where people for generations were not religious? Does strong punishment still apply there? That I don’t know. Such people may have the status of shogage or inadvertent sinners and not be considered guilty at least not at the level that serious punishment requires. When Rabbi Elchonon Wasserman zt”l the senior disciple of the Chofetz Chaim came to America to raise money for his Yeshiva, about a hundred years ago, most Jews were not religious. I was born in 1942 and once I was talking down the street wearing a yarmulke and a Jew approached me, very agitated, and said, “You wear a yarmulke in public? Don’t you know that people came from monkeys?” My father was America’s leading battery scientist who invented a battery that doubled the capacity of American non-nuclear submarines. He trained me how to argue. So I knew how to respond to anyone. I immediately thought of an answer to this fellow: What about giraffes who have huge high necks? Do they come from monkeys who have no high necks? But I was a very young boy and he was an older man, so I was silent. But that was America. Children were taught to ignore heaven and to make money. People like me from parents that I had were rare.

Today, when the style seems to be for ‘rabbis’ to invent a new Torah to force a GET and even not to give a GET at all, and there will be a crisis of mamzerim, I strongly advise people to consider marrying with Pilegesh, because even if it is somehow less than regular Kiddushin as it does not have Kiddushin or Kesubo, it also does not have mamzerim, and that, to me, is the main issue.

I wish to conclude by saying that I agree with the Ramban and the Gaon Rav Yaacov Emden that one who marries with Pilegesh may do so, but should  be guided by rabbis exactly how to maintain themselves. Yes, technically two people can marry with Pilegesh, but without constant rabbinical supervision and guidance for Pilegesh people to succeed is a different story. Also, there are perhaps certain leniencies in Pilegesh not available in regular marriage, but I would personally not have interest in helping people use these leniencies, because leniencies can damage peoples’ respect for Pilegesh. And this is likely a factor in what the Chelkas Mechokake says that some people protest when a family member marries with Pilegesh. But people who marry one on one a husband and a wife with Pilegesh, I say, kol hakode, but again, only if there are rabbis preferably from the community to guide them and to stand up for them that they are fine people and following the Torah.




[1] Shulchan Aruch Even Hoezer laws of Kiddushin 26:1. Ramo there explains that the Shulchan Aruch feels that if a man and woman marry with intent to marry without witnesses and without Kiddushin, we force them to separate. The Ramo explains because we fear that the couple who married without rabbis or witnesses will be embarrassed to go to the Mikva and thus will sin with Nida. But if the couple married with the knowledge of rabbonim who supervise the couple to obey all of the commands, including Mikvah, then Pilegesh is permitted. The Vilna Gaon provides proof for this to permit Pilegesh from gemora Sanhedrin 21A that “general marriage requires Kiddushin and Kesubo and Pilegesh requires neither Kiddushin or Kesubo.” The Vilna Gaon says that the understanding is that the Pilegesh has no obligation to make a Kiddushin or Kesubo. Nothing is mentioned about a GET, but major poskim say that no GET is required when the wife or husband wishes to end the marriage. Thus, the level of Pilegesh has nothing in the gemora that would obligate a Pilegesh, other than for the husband to provide his wife with a domicile in his house and for her to be faithful to him and not deal with other men with zenuse. If she does, she must leave his house and break up the marriage.

[2] Meyuchesses means that the Rashbo had many volumes filled with his teshuvose. But one of these volumes clearly had teshuvose signed by the Ramban. There the Ramban encourages Pilegesh and says that the Rambam permits it as long as it is not zenuse. We understand from the Ramban that the Rambam in Melochim who permits Pilegesh only for a king is talking about a person who takes a Pilegesh who will sleep with other men not her husband, as zenuse. But if she marries somebody as a real marriage, as was done by many people mentioned in Tanach, nothing is wrong. But if done derech Zenuse, a king may do it, we assume that nobody will go near the wife of a king, even if she does not accept the bonds of marriage. If the king, for instance, takes a very beautiful woman against her will, this is not a normal marriage, but is derech Zenuse, but nobody will antagonize the king and do anything about it. At any rate, the Ramban permits Pilegesh, along with the Vilna Gaon and Reb Yaacov Emden, and the Vilna Gaon says that the Rambam agreed. If so, we must explain the Rambam’s opposition to Pilegesh for one who is not a king as referring to a woman who did not join in marriage with her husband in the style of true marriage, but was taken by a person for her beauty or whatever reason, and because the marriage was forced, only a king may do such a thing.

[3] Shita Mekubetses Kesubose 64b page 1190 in my edition phrase beginning וכתב רבינו יונה ז"ל וזה לשונו

[4] The word in Hebrew is ללוותו probably means to walk with him

[5] See Shaarei Teshuva of Rabbeinu Yona number 139, 140, 141.





[1] Berochose 17A

[2] Bamidbar chapter 27 from passages 1-21

[3] Devorim 24:5


 How Reb Aharon Kotler Redesigned a World without Torah


We want to study a teaching of the Orach Chaim HaKodosh, in the beginning of Aikev, about head and feet. It answers a very strong question on the book of Malachi whose final passage produces a threat from HaShem to utterly destroy the world if fathers and sons don’t learn to get along properly with each other. But the Mishneh at the end of Sota tells us that before Moshiach comes boys quarrel with their fathers and ladies quarrel with their husband’s mothers. Why, then, is the world not destroyed? We will discuss this and to it add a discussion how my rebbe Reb Aharon Kotler came to America and revitalized the learning of Torah even in the Kollel experience. Stories about how he did this.

Goal Four: We live in a time of great confusion, as taught in the Mishneh in Sota mentioned above. Reb Aharon succeeded. How did he do it? And what can we do to succeed as well, in a world teeming with serious errors?

First of all, Goal One. How can we pray to HaShem if He is in heaven and we don’t understand anything about heaven with worldly finite minds?

The Torah begins “In the beginning of ___, HaShem created the heaven and the earth.” It does not say “the first thing in creation was the creation of heaven and earth.” It says “In the beginning of ___” meaning, it does not say in the beginning of what. Thus, the Torah begins with a statement that has no understanding.

But keep in mind that heaven is not a dimension open to people. And here the creation was about heaven as it was about earth. But in the beginning of creation means the beginning of heaven as well as earth. But people cannot understand heaven and so how can they understand in the beginning of what heaven was created?

We are not able to understand in the beginning of what heaven was created. So it is left unsaid. But that itself is crucial for us to understand. Yes, there is a heaven, and yes, we don’t understand it, and yes, G‑d wants us to know that there is a hidden heaven and that it is hidden from us, but we must know that it is there, and that HaShem is there, and that we have a role to play in heaven even if we don’t know what it is or what heaven is. But HaShem gave us a Torah, and although much of life is hidden from us, when we devote ourselves to learning Torah and studying under great rabbis, much becomes revealed to us.

In fact, the missing phrase in “in the beginning of__” has a meaning precisely what I just said. We cannot with our finite minds know HaShem or heaven, but if we study Torah properly. the lights of heaven percolate into our system, each person according to his efforts and piety. Each of us has the potential to understand things that are beyond us, through Torah and piety and fear of HaShem.

There is a famous story from the tsadik Reb Shlomo Schwadron, about the Second World War, which, when it broke out, and the Germans invaded Poland, led to terror and killing. A Jew fled Poland and came to Israel, because he realized that in Poland only death awaited the Jews. But if he came to Israel, perhaps somehow he could find a way to save his wife and children.

He came to Israel and remembered a tradition that one who prays forty days at the Kosel can merit miracles. He went for forty days to the Kosel, crying bitterly that HaSHem save his wife and children. On the fortieth day, he noticed a man praying. He realized that this man was not an ordinary person, but a great saint. Perhaps, he thought, this person can tell me about my family. He went to the person and asked him to please tell him how his family is. The man was befuddled and simply ran away. The Polish Jew ran after him, but the man ran home quickly and shut the door after him. The Polish man rapped on the door, and he heard inside somebody running. It was that same person who now opened the door and said, “Now I have the obligation of honoring a guest. Please, come in, and let me get something for you.” He brought out some food and was quite friendly. The Polish man said that he wanted to know about his wife and children. How are they? Is there a way to save them from the fiends?

The man suddenly grew somber, put his head down and thought a bit, and then asked, “And if I tell you, will it remain a secret?” “Yes,” said the man. The man asked, “Do you live in a house on the corner with two floors?” “Yes.” “The Germans are inside the house, but they are not bothering anyone. Your family will be safe and sound and come to Israel.” And so it was.

This is also the idea in “In the beginning of____” You and I don’t know what that missing phrase is, but that holy man did know. And each Jew has the potential to increase his piety and holiness and achieve wonderful knowledge through the Torah and light of heaven.

It was known that the holy rabbi Rav Yeshayeh Karelitz, the Chazon Ish, would regularly be consulted by very sick people, and he told them very often things completely opposite from the doctors. He once told somebody who asked him that the key to saving a person’s life was a doctor so and so, and the Chazon Ish added, that this doctor did not have to do anything for the sick person, but he had to be at the hospital during the surgery. For some reason, the doctor was unwilling to be the doctor to perform the surgery, and another doctor did it. But the person got better. The doctor then asked somebody, “Okay, your rabbi was able to determine that if I would come the person would get better, something that was not at all obvious to me. But how did he know that I should watch the surgery if I did nothing?” The answer: The rabbi wanted it that way. He knows why, I don’t.  As I recall the story the time came when this doctor himself came to the Chazon Ish and asked him why it was important for him to come if he did nothing. I don’t recall the answer. But it is known that the Chazon Ish, although a rabbi in a small farming village which eventually became a large city, was constantly besieged by people who needed this or that miracle immediately, and he always helped out. He actually was part of a group of relatives who were saints who did make miracles regularly. The great saint Reb Chaim Kanievsky is part of that family, and Rav Shach was also a participant in making miracles. Greatness in piety and greatness in Torah go a long way.

This first passage begins with the heaven and the earth, two opposite dimensions. Angels are in heaven and people are in this world. People in this world are removed from HaShem as He is in heaven. But HaShem created people who in a way are holier to Him even more than angels. For this reason the angels cry out in pain, Why are pious people close to G‑d and the angels outside of that level?

HaShem created angels who sing His glory and fulfill His will. People, on the other hand, are not angels, far from it. This world is filled with evil. Even good people are usually not perfect. As the woman in the Song of Songs said, “I have been made black as the ancient dead.” But the creation was essentially for humans who have evil inclinations and do sins, and they are required to live their lives with their pain and evil thoughts and deeds, and to do penitence, and then they will be forgiven. That penitence is light from darkness, and a very high light, the true purpose of Creation.

“From the darkness you will see the light.” But only from the darkness. The angels are heavenly and very close to HaShem, but they cry out that people are closer to HaShem than they are. Only light from darkness is the true holiness. Angels naturally perfect are remote from that. But people with their remoteness from heaven who repent their evil ways and seek light from darkness, can find it. And when their light arrives, it is the true purpose of creation.

People saddled with darkness and evil thoughts have a hard time finding light, and surely have a hard time discovering what the first passage of the Torah teaches, “In the beginning of ____ HaShem created the heaven and the earth.” Struggling to find that light is the purpose of life. Struggling to battle the evil inclination is higher than sitting in heaven and singing to HaShem, because light from darkness is the greatest light.

The Kabbalists says that when HaShem sent the soul of Adam from heaven into the world, He even then realized that the world would be filled with challenge, darkness, and yes, evil, and yes, pure evil. He wanted Adam to taste this evil even in the highest dimensions as he sailed down into the Garden of Eden. HaShem always knew that evil would be a great part of the world, as challenge, as the force that people would conquer to merit the highest light and portions in heaven greater than the angels who have no evil temptations. For this, HaShem had prepared in heaven a male and a female set of angels whose job it would be to bring evil when HaShem wanted them to do it. That job began with the sailing of Adam into the Garden of Eden. It continued when the angel of heaven whose job was to tempt men tormented Adam on the way down into this world, and her husband terrorized Adam’s wife Eve until she ate from the forbidden fruit and got the first humans expelled from the Garden of Eden. But we are going too fast.

The work of the angel whose job it was to torment men and seduce them began her work, as we explained, higher than this world, as Adam’s soul was coming down from heaven to the Garden of Eden. Her husband terrorized Eve who ate from the Forbidden Fruit and got Adam and her expelled from the Garden of Eden. But after she arrived in this world, she was sitting with her husband in heaven, during the marriage of Adam and Eve. The marriage of Adam and Eve was a Kabbalistic affair. They stared at each other and began to count the letters of the Alpha Beth, the alphabet. Each letter mentioned and studied brought great powers to the marriage. Soon the angels in heaven, almost all of them, were watching this, and then, as the letters went higher and higher, they all came down to watch up close.

The only angels left were those whose job was to bring evil to the world. They looked around and saw that they were all alone. This did not appeal to them. After all, they were created for a purpose. Sitting there while the angels watched the wedding was not their job. So they went down into the world. This time, it was the wife, an extraordinary beauty, who did her job. All she did was to walk near Adam as he was staring at Eve, who was also a great beauty, but she was not an angel, and Adam did notice the angel. That second, all of the angels disappeared. The wedding was over. The angel had done her job very well. Adam and Eve separated, unlike what we would anticipate for people who actually marry. In the case of Adam and Eve, there was only one woman in the world for Adam, and he should have accepted her and mollified her for noticing the angel, but he was so bitter that he decided to have nothing to do with Eve who had dealt with the snake and got both Adam and Eve banished from the Garden of Eden. For years, he lived alone. And when he slept, the angel of evil came to him and tempted him to give birth to forces of evil or demons. That angel really did a bang-up job. I think she should have asked for a bonus!

Adam’s misery continued for a long time. One day, he met Kain, the murderer of his brother Hevel. Kain didn’t appear to be a broken murderer. Adam asked why not and he said, “I repented and HaShem accepted it. He gave me a power to be saved from those who want to kill me.” When Adam heard that HaShem accepts penitence, he realized that that applied to him. The first step, he realized, was to make peace with his wife and establish a true marriage, based not on perfection but on the penitence that both of them had to make for what they had done to each other. Adam went to Eve and declared, “You are the mother of all life.” Now Adam and Eve were reconciled and the angel didn’t get a bonus for that.

One day Adam was talking to HaShem and asked how many years he would live. HaShem said, One thousand years. HaShem then told him about various people including King David. Adam asked how many years David would live. HaShem replied, a few hours. Adam said, “I give him seventy years of my life.” HaShem accepted that.

It is interesting to know that the gemora asks how it is possible that the most holy people, King David who said, “My heart is still inside of me” meaning it has no evil inclination, and the Jews at Sinai who died when HaShem spoke to them, and the angels brought them back to life with great crowns, but they worshipped the Golden Calf. The gemora explains that these people were not designed to sin, were far from it. But HaShem wanted to prove that the holiest people, those farthest from sin, can do the worse sins. Once people realized that even the holiest people can sin and HaShem accepts their penitence, anyone can repent, and indeed, the most important thing is not light or darkness, but penitence. King David did a lot of crying after the sin of Bas Sheva, which he did after HaShem warned him to anticipate divine testing that he would be forced to sin. David realized when he saw Bas Sheva that this was what HaShem meant. He realized also that if he controlled himself he would insult HaShem, and so he did the sin. For that he had to do a lot of crying and penitence. But that crying and penitence was what HaShem wanted, not the sin.

I want here to confess that my rebbe in the beginning of his sefer The Gates of the Kabbala quotes, as is his wont, the Vilna Gaon and other greats of Kabbala, to explain why HaShem created the world and how people can know HaShem when we can’t know Him. I don’t want to quote the exact words of these greats because I learned the hard way, after studying teachings of many gates of great kabbalists, that they didn’t necessarily want to reveal everything they said to people like me. I had to work very hard until I was able to follow their thinking, at least, to some degree.

Against my better inclinations, I suppose I should just say a few words of quote from words of these Kabbalists my rebbe quoted, although I fear it would just make some people like me confused. But to understand the true confusion here, let me say that the Kabbala takes literally the fact that this world is not only different than heaven, but people in this world with their very limited finite knowledge, are not only unable to know heaven and certainly HaShem, but even those forces that HaShem created specifically to bring light to people, contain sections that it not only is forbidden to describe them, but it is forbidden to even say that they exist!

Yes, HaShem created, for the benefit of people, Ten Sefirose, or worlds. The highest world is KESER or crown, and it is only a Sefira designed to bring light to people. But we may not say that it exists! The second sefira underneath KESER is CHOCHMO. We may say that it exists, but it is a heavenly body that imparts nothing of significance to mortals other than the fact that it exists, something forbidden for KESER.

CHOCHMO has a wife, BINA, the third Sefira down from the top. BINA is never separated from CHOCHMO, she has no fear from him, and they are never separated. Both of them were created simultaneously. But he is above the barrier to heaven and she is facing down into the bottom seven which are much closer to human understanding. CHOCHMO is terrified of KESER.

While we are at it, let us mention one fast fact. The bottom Sefira is a woman, MALCHUSE. Into her go the evil of this world, and she suffers terribly. She is the woman in the Song of Songs who cries out, “They have blackened me as the blackest in the world.” That sounds pretty terrible. But this is Kabbala. Rabbi Moshe Chaim Lutsato in Adir BaMorom says that MALCHUSE, meaning monarchy, has a good friend. It is a Sefira. And it is KESER. And guess what? Again, we are talking about the great Kabbalists. Just listen and don’t faint. KESER and MALCHSUE are one! KESER comes down to MALCHUSE and MALCHUSE rises, not up to KESER alone, but past KESER, into the heavenly realm where no humans may think what is happening there. Yes, MONARCHY and KESER are one, which is not the whole truth. The whole truth is that MALCHUSE goes farther into heaven than KESER. If you are not dizzy now, I can’t help you.

While you hopefully are dizzy, let me throw out some more dizziness, just quotes from my rebbe and the great Kabbalists such as the Vilna Gaon. HaShem wanted people to know Him, but that is impossible. How can mortals know heaven and how can they know HaShem? So HaShem created a force that enables people in this world to know HaShem enough to pray to Him and worship Him. Its name is צורת מרכבת אדם העליון in English the Form of the Chariot of the Senior Man. If you are not totally confused, allow me to help you. There is a passage in Ezekiel about his vision of a heavenly throne and the form of a man was upon it. Now, this passage was presented to all readers, the throne and the man. I don’t think it was a real man, of course, and I surely don’t believe it was HaShem chas vishalom. But could it have been the Chariot of the Senior Man, created by HaShem to reveal His light to mortals, perhaps when they study Torah properly? If you are dizzy, what difference does it make?