Profile Rabbi Dovid E. Eidensohn

Showing posts sorted by relevance for query marriage divorce. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query marriage divorce. Sort by date Show all posts

Sunday, June 4, 2017

Rabbis Produce a GET and then claim that they dissolved the marriage which a GET does not do

END CONTENTS   ###
Comment of Rabbi Dovid E. Eidensohn – the Article is filled with a story of a marriage being dissolved, something that is against the Torah. But the end of the article states clearly that the husband gave his wife a GET, which is proper in the Torah. Also, if the husband attempted to murder his wife, could that not prepare the rabbinic court to force the husband to give a GET? But there were two ways to celebrate the lady’s freedom. One, by stating that it was done by religious rabbis who obey the Torah, and the other way that it was “dissolved” in a way that is forbidden by the Torah. What the media wanted, and what the French rabbis wanted, was the emphasis on changing the Torah, not an emphasis on changing the attitude of the husband. Let us protest the lies in this article designed to denigrate the Torah, and let us protest the efforts at some rabbis to show they are “progressive” and violate the Torah to show their “progress.” End comment of Rabbi Eidensohn.

NEWS ARTICLE

Paris rabbinical court dissolves marriage of woman waiting 29 years for religious divorce

The ex-husband was sentenced in 1988 to nine years in prison for attempting to murder his wife

BY CNAAN LIPHSHIZ May 17, 2017, 1:52 pm 2

French Chief Rabbi Haim Korsia (right) with an Orthodox French woman who waited 29 years before receiving her write of divorce on May 16, 2017. (Courtesy)

JTA — A rabbinical court in Paris officially dissolved the marriage of a Jewish woman who for 29 years had tried unsuccessfully to obtain a religious Jewish divorce from her abusive ex-husband.

The move Tuesday by the rabbinical court of Paris at the seat of the Consistoire religious group was hailed as a success in the fight for women’s rights by French Chief Rabbi Haim Korsia, according to the French-language edition of The Times of Israel.
“This case became a symbol long ago,” Korsia told The Times of Israel, which is not naming the woman in question.
The couple received a civil divorce in 1988.

In Orthodox Judaism, a woman cannot divorce unless her husband consents, except in special cases where the husband is missing or unable to communicate his wishes. Women whose husbands refuse or are unable to give them a “get,” or religious divorce, are considered “agunot,” or chained women, and may not remarry.

In recent years, rabbinical courts have significantly cracked down on recalcitrant husbands, with prison sentences being handed down in Israel — where religious tribunals function as family courts as part of the judiciary. Outside Israel, rabbinical courts have punished such husbands by shaming them publicly and ostracizing them with a herem — banishment forbidding other Jews from socializing with the writ’s subject.
The problem of ‘agunot,’ or chained women, is international (illustrative photo: Serge Attal/Flash 90)
The woman’s husband ignored such rulings, prompting Korsia to facilitate the filing of a lawsuit against the husband in civil court for “causing damage” to his wife, The Times of Israel reported. The civil court ruled in favor of the woman in 2015, imposing penalties exceeding $60,000.



Comment of Rabbi Eidensohn – Note the final paragraph that the husband “finally agreed to grant his wife a get”, but that is contrary to the entire article that maintains that the French rabbis dissolved the marriage, which is not what a GET does. A GET frees the woman but does not dissolve the marriage. The article is thus a lie to denigrate the Torah and to raise up  the anti-Torah rabbis. I recently received a phone call from a Brazilian rabbi who complained that the anti-Torah element in his country are attacking the laws of Gittin. Some invalid Gittin produce mamzerim.

Saturday, January 12, 2019

Family and Children -How to Make them Happy and Wealthy; Divorce and Great Rabbis








Articles about Family and Children  by

Rabbi David E. Eidensohn   eidensohnd@gmail.com



Contents









Article One - How to Raise Happy and Successful Children


By David Eidensohn

Our topic is how to raise happy and successful children. We want here to describe two sets of children: One is the vast majority of Americans who are not Orthodox Jews, and the other are people like myself, who are deeply Orthodox Jews.

The deeply Orthodox Jews train their children to master the Torah from heaven and its teachings. And the Talmud is filled with instructions to see to it that before marriage a child must achieve some wealth. For years this bothered me very much. The great rabbis were often very wealthy. How was this possible if they were the greatest rabbis and had time not only to be great in Torah but in wealth? I never had an answer for that, until one day, I had an answer. Soon I will supply it, but first, since I am writing not only for the small number of deeply Orthodox Jews, but for all Americans, people of all religions and beliefs, I want to first touch on the great problems I have heard from friends who are professional teachers of children. It seems that even in Orthodox Jewish schools, many children fail. Why is this?

One reason is the terrifying problem of drugs. I know of a situation whereby some students would stand around a basement and suggest to other students to come in and enjoy themselves a bit, an enjoyment that ended in drugs. In one cemetery not far from my home there are two young boys who died in an overdose.

Whose fault is it? One problem is that our schools are based upon age. Children of one age are put in one class, or maybe two classes. The very bright students are bored silly by everyone else, the very weak students are destroyed by the other students, and the middle students suffer from top and bottom of the class. Is there any wonder that the school system itself is at fault? Why don’t we realize that forcing all ages in one class is destruction? But is there an alternative without breaking the back of the fiscal process?

When I realized the problem above that I mentioned, how great rabbis become Torah scholars of the highest order and yet become wealthy, which seems impossible, I began to think a lot about how to raise children that would become, if Orthodox Jewish, great in biblical teaching as well as wealthy, and if not Orthodox Jewish or of another religion or belief, could achieve their learning and wealth together. I finally came up with the solution, for everyone.

We know that all people in America spend a lot of time on television, movies, gulf, etc. and etc. Children surely do this. What do they gain from television, movies, etc.? Fun. Is that educational or just plain fun? Well, there is often some level of education, but basically, it is for fun. Much time of the day is spent on fun. Children grow up, the classroom is crowded with people who drain the interest from a lot of the children, and we don’t really have to wonder why some turn to drugs.

Well, what about using fire to fight fire? I mean, what if we could create fun for kids that was really worth while for them, I mean, if it could make them rich, honestly?

I wrote a fictional story about a Jewish kid named Shimi whose father was a farmer. The father and mother began training Shimi at a tender age to spend a few hours a day in Hebrew school learning Torah, but he also began, with the encouragement of his father and mother, to take fruits from the farm to school and trade them with goods that other kids brought to school. As time went on, his father began to urge him to learn how to rap on doors and sell things. The first stop was at the home of his father’s best friend, and when the friend saw who was waiting across the street from the little boy who rapped on his door, he realized immediately what the score was, and immediately purchased and made the child very happy. Shimi walked home with a few coins, and it really lifted his spirits. He wanted more coins, and gradually, his father turned him into a polished salesman, and then began training him in buying property.

Shimi’s father began his education how to purchase property by telling a story about a child he knew who once sold his bike for five dollars.  The child then discovered that the bike was worth ten dollars and was crushed. But the boy’s father was very happy that he had made such a mistake. He told him, “I have a friend who received a very large amount of money when he married a man’s daughter. But he had no experience in buying and lost all of his money. My son, you lost five dollars worth of a sale, but you will never again make a mistake in buying. It was really worth your time to make that mistake.”

Shimi never forgot what his father told him. “Learn from your mistakes.” When you are in business, you deal with people who want to make money, and you are at risk. Sometimes you will fall into a trap. Don’t let it bother you so much. Learn from it. And, here is the key, make sure you don’t repeat your mistakes.

 As time went on, not too much time, Shimi was really happy about Hebrew school and selling, and the money piled up. When Shimi turned to the age of Bar Mitsvah, thirteen years of age, he had already learned how to seek out and find property that the owner is desperate to sell at a ridiculous price, and he bought a very nice property. As time went on, he sold that property for a good sum and began buying other properties.

Shimi maintained his Torah studies, and some of his day was devoted to business. He had money, plenty of it, and purchased a vineyard and other properties, for his own use, and for eventual sale. Furthermore, as time went on, Shimi began encouraging people to buy land near his properties, or land on his properties, and when they arrived, he began guiding them in finding the right schools to raise happy children, learned in Torah and in business. Parents heard about this, and more and more people moved to Shimi’s estates.

One day, a very wealthy man came to Shimi’s parents, and they had a long talk, and emerged both very happy. Shimi had no idea who this person was or why he came to speak to his parents. Then the man came back: this time, he wanted to talk to Shimi. He told Shimi that he had a daughter, and Shimi’s parents knew about it and approved her as a potential wife for Shimi. He also said that his father was the local rabbi, but was getting along in age, and was about to retire. When he did, his synagogue would go to Shimi. The very wealthy man did not discuss how much Shimi would be paid, because he knew already that Shimi was himself wealthy. But he did tell Shimi that the choice of his salary was up to him, if he wanted it. Shimi wanted the job, but not the salary; he had no need for it. The wedding went through, and what a wedding it was! Shimi’s parents and their friends, Shimi’s friends who sent their children to his schools and moved into his estates, and many others came and rejoiced greatly. Here was a family that knew how to raise children, happy children, wealthy children, great in Torah learning. Many people who came to this wedding decided that they would consider for their own children, and maybe for themselves, a life with less television and more learning and more happiness.

If anyone is interested in making happy and successful children, contact me at David Eidensohn  at eidensohnd@gmail        or 845-578-1917.

Shalom!



Article Two – How to Make a Successful Marriage


by Rabbi David E. Eidensohn

The Talmud suggests that an early marriage, surely one supported by the parents and family, can help bring about a successful marriage. In the Orthodox world there are two types of parents. There are those who raise their children to prepare for this world and the next by studying the Torah, and also prepare their children to earn a living. These children come to maturity faithful to the dictates of their parents. When it comes time to marry, the parents or family make suggestions, or sometimes a stranger makes a good suggestion, and if the family and the boy or girl are interested, it could be a marriage. We call this the first type of parent or child, because the parents guide the steps of the child towards marriage and further.

Another type of family is when the child grows up independently, finds his or her own friends, and decides on their own how to earn a living. Sometimes a parent is unable to guide the child, or dies, or is in a family where the spouses quarrel or divorce. Surely in such situations a child is often on his own.

A child of a problem family has a problem escaping problems. So let us first concentrate on the first level, where a child is given a good start at finding the right way to marry. What is involved?

One thing the rabbis taught is that we want children to marry young. This means marrying at the age of eighteen or maybe seventeen, unless the boy is involved heavily in learning Torah and needs some more time. Furthermore, if a boy is actively seeking a wife, but has not found the right one, this may be acceptable, at least, for a few years.

There is, in addition, another idea, one so powerful it may even influence a child from the second level of seeking success in marriage, where the family is broken or divided or somewhat lacking what a child needs from his parents. That is the passage in the Torah “and he should make his wife happy.” Rashi and the Zohar tell us that this mitsvah is not a command for the wife and husband to treat each other properly. It is a mitsvah only upon the husband, that the burden of making his wife rejoice is not upon her, but only upon the husband. Raishis Chochmo explains that this can refer to monetary obligations that the husband has. If it is very cold outside and the husband only has money to buy one winter coat, he can buy it, but it should be for the wife. Obviously, when there is only one coat in the house, and this means that one person cannot go outside in the cold, we have problems. A great rabbi once had this problem and he took turns with his wife who would use the coat. But the basic idea is that the wife should, if possible, have her own coat. If it is impossible, it is impossible, but maybe the husband can find some job to support the needs of the family so that both husband and wife don’t freeze in the winter.

The mitsvah of “and he should make his wife happy” can apply even to the first level, when parents do their part in making children happy and successful, but people are what they are, and children being what they are, differences can sprout up, not only between couples, but between children and parents, and sometimes these differences lead to, in any kind of marriage, to anger and even divorce.

We have covered a lot of material in our short pages here, so let us pause a bit, and devote some space to divorce. This is important because divorce does happen and when it does many people simply refuse to remarry. This itself is a major disaster, and it consumes a large section of the community, even the Orthodox community.



Article 3 - Divorce – Why it Occurs; and What is Next?




Why does divorce occur? People don’t get along for many reasons. That often brings about divorce.

Therefore, we must turn to the next question in our title: What is Next?

Divorce is a tragedy, but it is one that can be repaired. A person can remarry. The tragedy today is that people who divorce often refuse to remarry. Not only do they refuse to remarry, but they shack up illicitly with others who often have no intent to remarry. People are desperate to get people married and produce very expensive programs to get people to come down and meet somebody that they may marry. They meet, they talk, they go for a walk or a drive, they go to a nice restaurant, maybe a nice movie, and rarely do they remarry. A rabbi who is heavily involved in these issues told me that even Orthodox Jews who were divorced are not easily enticed into remarrying, and they, sadly, end up sinning, HaShem Yerachem.  

Let us talk about this a bit. A person marries, it doesn’t work out, and perhaps, husband and wife have no marital relations. Such a thing is possible, and is even discussed in religious books on marriage. One serious book suggests that if a woman lives in the house with her married husband, but loses interest in having marital relations with him, and she stays in the house tending the children and working in the house in general, despite her refusal to have marital relations, this is something that requires the rabbis in the community to understand. What is happening? Why has the wife acted this way? Is the husband behaving properly? What went wrong?

One opinion states that a key element in the discussion is this: Does the wife refuse marital relations because she demands a divorce, that is, she wants to be free of the husband entirely, and perhaps to remarry? Or does she not want to leave the house, but will continue to live there, along with the husband in the same abode, but refuses to have relations with him.

This question then ties in with another teaching from the gemora. It seems that at a time a woman who demanded a divorce from her husband and states a reason why she wants the divorce, was generally believed. Because, in those very early years, women were known to be honest and not lie about their husbands. But as time went on, and the rabbis noted that some women were lying about their husbands simply because they preferred a different person to be their husband, and the stories about her present husband were quite possibly not true, then the rabbis ruled that women could not force the husband to give them a divorce. However, and this is a key point: If she does not demand a divorce, and does not mention the words “I want a divorce,” but can say what she wants about the husband regarding her refusal to have marital relations with him, in such a case, it is highly possible that the next step is for senior rabbis to talk to the husband. Is he treating his wife right, or not? The rabbis give the husband a certain amount of time to straighten things out in the house with his wife. If it works, fine, marriage is back in style in that house. But if it doesn’t work, and the wife has not demanded a GET, then the rabbis may decide to force the husband to give a GET.[1]

Now, the fact that a woman does ask for a GET means we don’t force the husband, because we don’t trust the woman because maybe she asks for a GET not because her complaints are true, but because she would prefer a different man for her husband. But if the rabbis can ascertain on their own that the husband has done things to cause grief to the woman in a manner that can bring about a forced GET, so that the woman is not the one who talks bad things about the husband but the rabbis independently realize this, that may result in a forced GET. Such is mentioned in the Shulchan Aruch when the rabbis sense that a man has taken a job that requires him to acquire a terrible smell that no woman can tolerate, he may, possibly, be forced to divorce his wife.[2]

The Torah commands a man to marry and to have children, a boy and a girl. Ideally, he should continue to have more children. There was a case where a man had many boys and no girls. A rabbi suggested that he divorce his wife because he was unable to fulfill the command to have a son and a daughter. But the senior rabbi of the time, Rav Yosef Shalom Elyashev, cautioned prudence. No divorcing. Indeed, some say that women are not superior to men and two men may equal a man and a woman. It is true that the Talmud says that HaShem respects women more than men and trusts them perhaps more than men, but when it comes to force a man to divorce his wife for having two boys and no girls, that is off track.

But when a couple simply refuses to have marital relations, and have not had even the basic two children, this is serious. Do the rabbis intervene and force a divorce? Do they force intimacy? These are separate issues, but very relevant to the people involved. In other words, when marriage doesn’t work, and people do not divorce, we have serious problems, maybe problems that have no workable solution. And what of the people who don’t have relations but don’t divorce? Do we threaten them? I don’t present here solutions to these terrible problems, which do happen, only to say that these are the kind of things that can occur in a marriage, and they do. What we can try to do is to find a way to solve the problems, hopefully, with no divorce, but if no solution appears, what else can be done?[3]

Article 4 – Great Rabbis Guide Their Generation and Community


It was my privilege to study under the great rabbis from Europe and Israel from the age of about eleven for decades and I received approbations in writing and orally that I had mastered difficult parts of the Torah. Of course, I only learned under a few of the great rabbis from Europe and Israel. If we look into Jewish history, we find many great ones who lived far before me. I feel therefore an obligation to discuss both those rabbis that I personally studied under and received their approbations, and those rabbis who are the subject of higher and hidden achievements in earlier generations and countries. Both deserve our thoughts.

I want to begin this discussion with a personal shocking statement I made in a gemora class. The rabbi was discussing the greatest rabbis of past times, such as the Chofetz Chaim, etc. Everyone was very moved until I opened my mouth and declared, “I am bigger than they were.” People were shocked, except for the Rabbi, who knew me well. He waited, as he was so accustomed, for my punchline, because I was always talking to him and he liked to end with a punchline of his own. But everybody was now also waiting for the punchline and could not believe what possible thing I could say. So I said it:

“I wear a yarmulke.” The Rov smiled.

In other words, I was born in Washington, DC, in a time in America where almost nobody was religious. Indeed, in those days, American Jewish children usually had no serious Torah school to attend. Thousands of European Jews who were religious came to America, but they had no religious school for their children, and the children went to public school, as I did. What made me so exceptional was that I wore a Yarmulka. To do that in a world that trained children, one, to reject Judaism and two, to make money, meant that if you wear a yarmulke in public that was a big problem. I learned that the hard way.

I was about eleven years old and I was wearing a yarmulke and walking down the street. A man who was probably a middle-aged Jew came over to me, and with very strong objection, asked me, “You wear a yarmulke in public?” Then he added, “Don’t you know that people came from monkeys?”

Now my father was perhaps the leading battery scientist in the world. He doubled with one battery the power of the Navy’s submarines, for which he received a very high honor and the whole family participated. For that I came to the office of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy and took off my yarmulke until I left.

What I want to bring out is that I would always talk to my father and was thoroughly trained in replying to people. I immediately thought, “You say that people came from monkeys? And where did giraffes come from?” But I had respect for an older man and kept quiet. But I was thoroughly trained to reply.

But where did I learn to wear a yarmulke? When I was very young, I went to public school by day, and afterwards went to Yeshiva Or Torah DiBrisk, a school with three rabbis and four students. And the rest of the time I went to public school. As time went on, and I entered high school, an Orthodox Jewish teacher told my parents, “Get David out of this public school. Send him to a religious Yeshiva  such as they have in Baltimore.” I was soon in Baltimore, where I studied three years under the Gaon Rabbi Yaacov Bobrowsky.

But what ever happened to the Yeshiva Or Torah DiBrisk in Washington, DC? After I left it and went to Baltimore, the Yeshiva Or Torah DiBrisk lasted a few years. But just a week or so before the Six Day War, the two Malin rabbis took their entire families and moved to Israel. That was a very dangerous thing to do. Because it was generally considered that a war was coming with the Arab determined to wipe out the Jews in Israel. To take one’s entire family to Israel at such a time was an incredible act of courage. And of course, it paid off. In a few days, six or seven days (Called the Six Day War but the Tsadik Rav Levenshtein predicted weeks before that the war would last seven days) the Arabs were destroyed and Israel had enormous new territory to call its own. The Malin brothers went to work taking over buildings. The government approached them: If you have the money to support these large buildings you are taking, fine. But if you don’t have the money to support taking these buildings, the Arabs will demand that you give them back their buildings. So, make sure you have the money to take these buildings. The Malin brothers bought several large buildings and built very large Yeshivas, from little children to Kollel, until their Yeshiva became one of the biggest in Israel. This was their reward for trusting in HaShem and coming to Israel at a time when senior Zionists were fleeing from Israel out of fear of the Arabs. And incidentally, also senior British officers were running.

My three years in Yeshiva Chofetz Chaim in Baltimore studying under the great scholar Rabbi Yaacov Bobrowsky were very special and beloved for me. I met there a brilliant Torah scholar who was not well, but who lived in Baltimore, and could not spend too much time in his Yeshiva which was in Monsey. We became friends and he advised me that when I graduate high school, I go to Lakewood Yeshiva and study under the great Rabbi Aharon Kotler.

I was aware that I was making a major leap, but I did what he said, and when I came to Lakewood I worked very hard on preparing something to say to Rabbi Kotler. I said to him, “A equals B.” He replied, “It is equal if you feel that fish equals a wall,” which was his style in destroying the mistakes of his disciples and everybody else. I decided then and there, “I am talking to the greatest rabbi in the world only because I have chutspah (audacity), and I will be back tomorrow.” As time went on, Rabbi Kotler acknowledged that I had mastered his style in Talmud, which was a mighty compliment. I spoke to him constantly, in the study hall, while he walked to the dining room, and even at supper in his private room where nobody disturbed him.

I was once talking to him in his private dining room and suddenly three rabbis barged into the room. They were full of fire and so was Rabbi Kotler. They began a furious discussion in very fast Yiddish and I didn’t understand one word of it, but I did notice that the rabbis had placed a book on Rabbi Kotler’s table. Ten minutes of furious discussion (they all agreed about something that I didn’t understand) and I simply went over and opened the book they had placed, which was obviously the source of the explosion, which both agreed on. On and on the explosion went on and I finally realized what they were all upset about.

In those days, when people graduated from high school, special books were made filled with pictures and comments about each graduate. Most classes in religious schools had about thirty students. The girls, when they graduated, were eligible for marriage. And they knew that the boys would look at their pictures to select a wife. That infuriated Rabbi Kotler and the rabbis who brought the book. I thought to myself, if they ask me, the youngest student in the Yeshiva, to contact the dean of that girls’ school, that book would have instantly disappeared. So why did they sit and fume so long among themselves? I realized that Rabbi Kotler and those rabbis were fighters. And fighters fight. I determined that I, too, would be a fighter. In a few years, I began furious attacks on what I felt were bad mistakes made in matters of marriage and divorce.

Years later, I taught a class in Monsey, NY, and the senior rabbi in America, Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, who was the major authority in Jewish law, would often visit Monsey with his wife, because his daughter was the wife of the rabbi of the synagogue there. I was terrified talking to Rabbi Feinstein, but I used my chutspah to ask him many questions, and he answered them. Eventually, I started rapping on the door of the rabbi of the synagogue who was his son-in-law, and he was kind enough to admit me to the house where Rabbi Moshe Feinstein responded to all of my questions.

I recall the time that I asked him a difficult question, for which he flipped out a gemora and turned to the page he wanted, and was he shocked: It was a page off! The great rabbis in that generation liked to identify the correct page in the Talmud exactly, and if they were off even a page, it was terrible!

I began writing books in English and Hebrew on difficult Talmudic subjects, and Rabbi Feinstein presented me with a written approbation that said, “I know Rabbi Eidensohn for many years as one who delves deeply into complex Talmudic teaching.” That is the ultimate compliment from the major expert in Jewish law of the generation. I received a similar paper from the great rabbi Rav Yaacov Kaminetsky, who at the time lived in Monsey, NY where I lived.

I present here something I once heard in a talk from Rav Yaacov Kaminetsky. He lamented the decline of the generations, from the very great to the lesser rabbis. He then said, “Do we have the right to say that we are no longer in the same league with the great sages of yesteryear? No. Today, we don’t even have the right to say that we are not worthy. And so, the generations just continue to decline until heaven reveals a happier world.”

I mentioned before regarding Rabbi Moshe Feinstein that the senior European rabbis were supposed to know every page in the Talmud perfectly together with the deeper ideas on it and all statements about that topic in the entire Torah literature. When Rabbi Feinstein, in his older age, was off one page, he was stunned. A similar story took place with Rabbi Yaacov Kaminetsky, which took place after he had a serious stroke, which left him very depressed. He, at the youngest age, had already read much of the bible and memorized every word which he would easily recite to anyone interested. Now he was advanced in the nineties and had a stroke. People said, “He cannot learn as he once did, and as a result, he wants to die, but his soul won’t release his body.”

In this state, people really feared praying for Rabbi Kaminetsky, but we did, and he was now sitting outside in Monsey when I came with another person to visit him and encourage him.

When we came, the person with me who was a prominent rabbi, told Rabbi Kaminetsky that I want to tell him a Torah interpretation. He accepted it and I told him that the Torah reading of the time was about Moshe about to die. Rashi, a major commentator, writes that Moshe lost the ability of his great wisdom at that time, just prior to his death. I asked, “If Moshe lost his great wisdom just prior to his death, how was it possible for him to, without wisdom, write the most difficult sections of the bible, without wisdom?”

Rabbi Kaminetsky became furious because he thought I was making fun of him. But I continued and answered my question: “Rabbi! Moshe was Torah!” Rabbi Kaminetsky heard that and accepted my good thoughts, that he, with a terrible stroke, and without his great wisdom, “was Torah” and could continue with heavenly help what his mind could no longer produce. Not long after that a dear friend of Rabbi Kaminetsky came to visit him and I left, but I always praise heaven that I merited to make Rabbi Kaminetsky happy and accept his situation, as he, with his stroke and loss of his previous mastery of the Talmud, “was Torah” and should be rightfully proud, that he was now as Moshe the master servant of HaShem. And whatever Moshe had to say, he said, although it was not produced by his native brilliance, but by the miracle of HaShem feeding him the Torah itself.

I am now about eighty years old, and I don’t remember what I used to. But when I sit down and clack out answers to serious questions on difficult parts of the Torah, I look at what I just wrote, and I say, “That is not from me. That is from HaShem.” And it is.

And now a very personal aside about me and my wife who are both pushing eighty. For about fifty years my wife supported the family and I was free to study Torah and write books. But finally, my wife realized that dragging around heavy boxes was not going to last and she is closing her business. When I realized that, I felt responsible to fill the gap and make some money. I prayed to HaShem and said, “I once raised money for my books by rapping on doors a few hours a week. But now I can no longer do this. I pray to You to find some source of money from You that I cannot produce on my own.”

Right afterwards I received a letter from a gentile woman who wrote about marriage in a prominent group of experts. She wanted to write for my blog on marriage and divorce and family or offer me the option to send her an article to be published in some major magazine. I wrote an article about a fictional character whose parents sent him to Hebrew school most of the day but also trained him in making money. When he came to marriageable age, he was quite wealthy from selling properties and encouraging parents to buy lots on his properties. He encouraged the parents to do as his parents, to teach their children schooling and how to make money.

I then received a letter from the editor of the organization that the lady who first wrote me belonged. The editor asked me for a picture and a small blurb about my life for the magazine they would send my article to. Other people I spoke to made other suggestions how I could make money with my writings.

If anyone has questions on family or marriage, etc., they can contact me at eidensohnd@gmail.com or 845-578-1917. I cannot promise to reply quickly to all questions, but I can try. If anyone is in a position to help support my writings and books, please let me know and I will be most appreciative. Shalom, David Eidensohn



[1] See Teshuvose of Ramo 36 and especially 96. Rambam only says we force a GET when the wife complains about the husband but does not ask for a GET, but if she asks for a GET we do not force the husband to divorce her.
[2] See Shulchan Aruch Even Hoezer 154.1 If the husband acquires a terrible smell and the wife demands a divorce she is within her rights. The evil smell is obvious to the rabbis and everybody who smells it, and is not the invention of the wife.
[3] See above mentioned Teshuvose of Ramo 36 and 96. Lengthy discussions are there that touch on these kind of problems without clear and solid solutions other than quoting various senior commentators and referring the actual matter to senior rabbis of the time of the questions. This is the problem with these problems. Who knows the solution? What we get basically from this is that marriage doesn’t always work, and escaping a broken marriage is not always easy or even always possible.

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Leaving Without a GET: "Daas Torah" in Philadelphia

In our previous posts here, we have discussed the problem of the modern Yeshiva and its invention in halacha, especially the laws of Gittin, where women are helped by forcing the husband to divorce, which makes an invalid GET and mamzerim. But just when we thought that things could not get worse, we find that in Philadelphia a married woman is going on dates. She, it is said, has stated that she is "free" and she has Shalom Kaminetsky to support her and help her remarry. He told somebody that I know and trust that although she has no GET, she doesn't really need one. He refused to say what rabbi said that a married woman doesn't need a GET. However, since Shalom's father is Reb Shmuel Kaminetsky, we assume that he works with his father's permission. The girl and her family are known to be close to the Kaminetskys.

In our previous posts we showed proof that the Roshei Yeshiva who permitted humiliating a husband have no proof or opinion to support them, as they defy open teachings of the Rashbo in teshuva VII:414, Radvaz Volume II:118, the Beis Yosef author of the Shulchan Aruch in Tur 154, and the Chazon Ish in Gittin 108. Furthermore, the true gedolim in Israel have written in letters and a new sefer published on the subject that anyone who receives a GET from a Beth Din that practices coercions in defiance of halacha must have another GET, as the first one is not recognized. I heard personally from HaGaon Rav Yosef Shalom Elyashev zt"l that a Beth Din that coerces a GET in violation of halacha loses its chezkas beth din, meaning as the present gedolim have said, that the woman needs a new GET from a kosher Beth Din.

Surely, a Beth Din that allows a married woman to remarry without a GET entirely is an invalid Beth Din, and all Gittin that it makes are invalid unless a reliable Beth Din investigates carefully and approves the GET.

Of course, the Philadelphia inventors of halacha have no source for what they say. But there are plenty of sources that disagree, as we will bring here. First of all, Maharshal in teshuva 41 says that even a wicked husband who converts to another religion and cannot do anything positive for the wife in marriage, the marriage is still valid, and the issue is whether to coerce him to give a GET. But the Philly Rosh Yeshivas disagree with the Marshal, whom the Ramo considered to be greater than he was, and they have ruled that such husbands allow the wife to remarry without a GET.

And what if the wife becomes wicked and leaves the house? Is the husband free to remarry without a GET? The Posek HaDor of his time Reb Yitschok Elchonon zt"l in AYIN YITSCHOK I, the first few teshuvose, has many cases like this, and in all of the cases, the marriages stood, and the husband had to give a GET or have HETER MAYO RABONIM. See also teshuva 36 the husband became insane, and yet, she is not free to remarry until it is known that the husband died. See also teshuva 61 a wicked man gave a ring to a girl and uttered You are mikudeshes li and she obviously did not want to marry him. It is obvious from the teshuva there that if she did hear all of his words even if she immediately afterwards rejected him there would be a serious problem of her being married to him. But the Philly rabbis, if she would have had a father close to their Yeshiva, would have taken care of her that she was free to remarry.

Also, throughout history there have been women whose husbands turned wicked and left them and they are Agunose. Why did the rabbis of those times not say that since the husband is so wicked as to leave his wife and become a rosho that the wife would never have married him in the first place had she known how evil he was, and therefore, the marriage never took place? But the rabbis throughout history have never ruled that a woman whose husband has turned wicked can say that she never would have married a wicked person and therefore the marriage never took place.

Furthermore, in the worst case scenario, when a woman has a wicked husband and it is known that had she known about him she never would have married him, we find clearly that the marriage is not ended and she is still married. See Shulchan Aruch Even Hoezer 154:1 in Ramo that a husband who marries a woman and then becomes a member of another religion, that the marriage is still valid and the wife is not free to remarry without a GET. There is even a question whether such a person can be coerced to divorce. Now, according to the Philadelphia inventors, why can't the woman simply say that she never would have married such a person who changes his religion, and then remarry?

The Ramo says there that if the husband is known to have relations with strange women, some permit to coerce such a husband to divorce. But we see that if the husband is not coerced to divorce, the woman cannot just leave because she never would have married such a wicked person and the marriage was a mistake. Indeed, where do we find in the Shulchan Aruch that a woman is married, maybe has children, and the husband becomes wicked and the marriage disappears? There is no such thing.

Furthermore, the lady in Philadelphia has never claimed that her husband is wicked or anything of the sort. She simply says that she could find a better husband, even after she had a child from the first husband. The first husband is a very respected person with a very good job in Congress. So how can the inventors in Philadelphia come up with a reason to remove the marriage after she had a child with the first husband especially as even she never said he did anything hideous?

Without going into further proofs here, we see that the "Daas Torah" Rosh Yeshivas who invented the permission to coerce husbands because the wife was a cousin or friend of a Rosh Yeshiva, which is pure corruption, now have invented the removal of marriage entirely, despite the fact that nobody in Jewish history ever said such a thing. And if it is true, that whenever a wife regrets marrying the husband the marriage is removed, what marriage is there that hasn't been removed at one time or a hundred times over as people always have moods and disagreements and even worse, but who assumes like the Philly rabbis that the marriage disappears simply because the wife wants the marriage to disappear so she can marry somebody else?

Some years back the Rosho Rackman invented this idea, that any woman whose husband did not give a GET, can remarry, because had she known that he would not give her a GET, she never would  have married him. And all of the rabbis, including and especially the YU rabbis, blasted him out for this, and eventually, he pulled back somewhat. For sure, all of the women who remarried from Rackman lived in sin and their children from the new husband are mamzerim. And the Philly lady if she remarries, will have mamzerim for children. BE WARNED! The Philly rabbis who encouraged a married woman to remarry without a GET are wicked and have no place in halacha. Nobody should ever ask them an opinion in Torah, because they just invent what they want and call it "Daas Torah" as we explained. How anyone can send their child to the Philly Yeshiva is beyond me. If the Yeshiva rabbis there told people to eat treifeh, would anyone send their child there? So how can anyone send a child to that Yeshiva, and how can anyone contribute to it, when the Yeshiva rabbis encourage mamzerim and women sinning with other men who are not their  husbands?

Yes, there are some "rabbis" who encourage the remarriage of married women without a GET. One is the head of the RCA, the same Beth Din that issued a siruv to the FBI's fake husband. If you want fake husbands, and fake halacha, go to the RCA and the rabbis of the Philly Yeshiva. At any rate, in the Philly situation, to my knowledge no rabbi has openly permitted the woman to remarry. Obviously, the Kaminetkys are aware of what she is doing and Shalom's active help is proof that he and probably his father approve of her remarrying without a GET. Both of them are deserving of CHEREM. They are producing mamzerim, and if a mamzer is produced, they are the child molestors. Please, don't send your child and do not support a Yeshiva run by child molesters!


Saturday, August 5, 2017

questions about the Laws of Pilegesh from Deena Tova

marriage be allowed to remarry her first husband if the second one died (or "divorced") her?
Questions about the Laws of Pilegesh from Deena Tova on my blog torahhalacha.blogspot.com.


Questions;
1) A women who had a kosher divorce and remarried a second husband with a pelegesh marriage. Is she allowed to remarry her first husband if the second one died (or "divorced") her?
2) Would a kohen who married using a pelegesh marriage be allowed to stay with his wife if she was lo alanu raped.
3) Would the children of a pelegesh marriage of the father being a kohen be considered kosher kohanim?
4) Would a man be allowed to marry more than one wife with a pelegesh marriage?
5) Would a women who married by pelegesh marriage and "divorced" be allowed to marry a kohen?
6) Why would there be a problem about a lady going to a regular mikvah? Who has to know if it is a marriage by kiddushin or by pelegesh marriage?
7) Would this solve problems if a husband dies but it can't be proven, or he disappears, that the wife could somehow get remarried?
8) Would this mean that the wife’s earning in a pelegesh marriage belongs to her?


Thank you very much for your really excellent questions. First of all, when somebody wants to know what the halacha is in a specific case, there are two kinds. One is a case, such as is a food kosher, or what we may do on Shabbos, which is something taught in many books easily available, and is well known to the various rabbis who work in these areas regularly. Then there is a question about Pilegesh. Who today is involved in these questions? There are here or there somebody married as a Pilegesh, but I don’t know how many rabbis are experts in the halacha of Pilegesh.

Second of all, when I suggest somebody marrying with Pilegesh, it is mainly because I have a terrible fear of Kiddushin. For most women, when the marriage sours, they will find a “rabbi” who will tell them to force a GET from their husband, and some of them, all over the world now, just tell a woman to leave with no GET! Children born from an invalid GET or surely from no GET are mamzerim. Thus, when I trumpet how important Pilegesh is, it is because most women today cannot be trusted to spend their whole lives with a husband they don’t like. People like that should not marry with Kiddushin in the first place. For them Pilegesh is preferable. Whenever she wants, she just leaves. And the gemora in Sanhedrin 21A, quoted by the Vilna Gaon in the beginning of the Laws of Kiddushin in Shulchan Aruch, clearly states that people may marry a Pilegesh without making Kiddushin.

Thus, I would not necessarily tell a woman who is positive she can maintain her life with a bad husband forever, with never violating the Torah and making an invalid GET or no GET, to marry not with Kiddushin but with Pilegesh. Having said that, another side of me says that today things are bad, and in ten years, they will be much worse, and in twenty years, very, very bad. That is what is happening today. If so, I would really be happy if no woman marries with Kiddushin, because who knows?

We have two major poskim who strongly suggest marrying with Pilegesh. One is the Ramban and the other is Reb Yaacov Emden, son of the Chacham Tsvi. The Ramban states clearly that Pilegesh is permitted, period. He even claims that the Rambam agreed with him.  The other person is Reb Yaacov Emden, who is very strong about encouraging Pilegesh, but for different reasons. He maintains that many people need the freedom to marry a Pilegesh, for various reasons. His approach is that Pilegesh can save many people from many terrible sins and problems.

My great fear today of women stuck in marriages done with Kiddushin is rooted in the reality that today major rabbis, the biggest names, are encouraging many women to remarry without a kosher GET and thus have children who are mamzerim. The count of mamzerim is going to rise more and more and the only hope is Pilegesh. Pilegesh is the only way to solve the problem of making mamzerim with invalid Gittin. Unless the husband dies!
Now let us get to the excellent questions. Some questions can have a strong answer and some a doubtful answer, but at least, let us try to answer as well as we can. That is, when we have to answer a question we like to find sources that say clearly what the answer is. But in Pilegesh there are very few sources that tell us clear answers, and even the ones who do tell us various things don’t do it in the clearest fashion. So, some questions here will be answered one way and some the other. I will do what I can bli neder.
Let me add another important thing. The laws of Pilegesh are much more lenient than the laws of Kiddushin. People today are accustomed to Kiddushin and yet, to avoid mamzerim, we encourage people to think about marrying with Pilegesh. And yet, if we talk about the leniencies some rabbis have in Pilegesh, we will lose respect for those who considered marriage in conservative terms. I am very strong in that. Meaning that I believe that somebody who wants to marry Pilegesh must only do it with a rabbi and preferably a Beth Din backing them. This Beth Din, I feel, must prepare for the Pilegesh people the ability to leave the marriage at any time, to avoid the terror of Agunose. But to go into the leniencies some rabbis may have for Pilegesh can spoil people’s appreciation or acceptance of Pilegesh. Therefore, I want to present Pilegesh mainly as a regular marriage with a conservative bent, the exception being that the Pilegesh people can leave at any time with no penalty. The answers I supply here reflect this latter conservative belt.


Questions from Deena Tova;
1) A women had a kosher divorce and remarried a second husband with a pelegesh marriage. Is she  allowed to remarry her first husband if the second one died (or "divorced") her?
Answer from Dovid Eidensohn

Questions from Deena Tova;
1) A women had a kosher divorce and remarried a second husband with a pelegesh marriage. Is she  allowed to remarry her first husband if the second one died (or "divorced") her?
Answer from Dovid Eidensohn
If the first husband gave her kiddushin, as it seems from the question, and then made a kosher divorce, that husband still has a connection with the divorced lady, from Kiddushin. If so, if the lady married previously with kiddushin then married with Pilegesh, whereby the husband does not acquire here and there is no compelling the woman to refrain from this or that husband, and no kiddushin that can interfere here, it would seem that she should be able to return to the first husband who does have a connection with her from his kiddushin. It makes no difference if the second Pilegesh husband died or “divorced” her, because Pilegesh doesn’t have the problems of Kiddushin, only basically to honor marriage with faithful dignity.

See also Shulchan Aruch Even Hoezer 12:7  “A Pilegesh is married to a man, and she decides to leave him and marry somebody else, must wait 92 days [as taught in the entire chapter there that people who may be pregnant must wait 92 days and some include even those who cannot have children, etc.] The Chelkas Mechokake there #6 who says, “We are talking that she became pregnant  in error, and yes, if a Pilegesh becomes pregnant from her [Pilegesh] husband and then she goes and takes Kiddushin marriage from another man, and then is divorced from him with a kosher GET, she may return to her first husband [married with Kiddushin], just as a woman married with Kiddushin who was divorced from him with a proper GET may remarry her Kiddushin husband, because a Pilegesh goes with the name of the first husband [who had Kiddushin].

2) Would a kohen who married using a pelegesh marriage be allowed to stay with his wife if she was lo alanu raped?

Answer: See Even Hoezer 6:10 – If the wife of a Kohen is slept with even if it was forced is forbidden to her husband. See Beis Shmuel there 22 that the wife is forbidden to her Kohen husband because she is a zona. Thus even if the rapist was a Yisroel or a gentile the wife becomes a zona because we rule that any one who is forbidden to marry the woman and sleeps with her in sin whether willingly or forced she becomes a zona and is forbidden to a Kohen. If the woman and her husband were Pilegesh  recall that the Ramban says clearly that Pilegesh marriage does not give the husband acquisition like Kiddushin, it does not forbid marrying somebody else as Kiddushin does, and it does not convey a holiness as Kiddushin does, and that holiness can make problems but only in Kiddushin, as it does not function with Pilegesh. On the other hand, Pilegesh is certainly a marriage, otherwise the Torah does not permit men and women to be together with Kiddushin or Pilegesh marriage. If Pilegesh is a marriage even if it has less strict laws than Kiddushin, it is still a marriage. And if it is a real Torah recognized marriage (see Sanhedrin 21A and the Gro in the beginning of the laws of Kiddushin in Shulchan Aruch) and if the woman would leave her husband and go down the block to sleep with somebody she would violate Pilegesh marriage, it is quite possible that the wife would even in rape, become a zonah. If so, she is forbidden to her Kohen husband. However, there is no open source for this and those who talk about Kiddushin and a woman who becomes a zona for sleeping with somebody forbidden to her, do not talk about Pilegesh. So I cannot be sure, because even the Ramban never said that Pilegesh is not a marriage. Because if it is not a marriage, is it from the street? If so, why is Pilegesh not forbidden if it not really a marriage?

3) Would the children of a pelegesh marriage of the father being a kohen be considered kosher kohanim?

Answer. Rav Yaacov Emden the son of the Chacham Tsvi in his sefer שאילת יעקץ  II:15 at the end says that “(in a Pilegesh marriage) the husband should explain to her that a child born from their Pilegesh marriage will be כשרים כשאר מיוחסים בישראל.” Pilegesh is a real marriage and the children are full Jewish children. If the father is a kohen and the marriage is Pilegesh his marriage is one כשאר מיוחסים בישראל. Thus, we would assume that the child is a Cohen. The exception might be in earlier times when Kohanim invented for their own pride higher standards for marriage. Most Jewish marriages give a woman two hundred zuz, but some Kohanim insisted on four hundred zuz. If, for some reason, the family didn’t want Israelites or Levites but only Cohanim, although this has nothing to do with halacha, the non-Kohen may not be welcomed, but not because she is Pilegesh, but because of the invention of higher standards which is a privilege of the priesthood, Kehuna at least in earlier times when people did these things. I don’t know if there are people today who do these things, I just don’t know.



4) Would a man be allowed to marry more than one wife with a pelegesh marriage?

Answer: It would seem from the Gaon Rav Yaacov Emnden at the end of his teshuva on Pilegesh II:15 that a Talmid Chochom had no children from his wife and therefore got permission to marry a Pilegesh to have a child, and this Rav Yaacov Emden praises and says that Pilegesh can save people from problems such as that. But that was an urgent problem and he doesn’t say that people can just go around marrying two or ten ladies with Pilegesh. Also, I personally would have nothing to do with people who marry with Pilegesh and then marry with such marriages, because it will destroy respect for Pilegesh. Right now there is a very strong push against Pilegesh, and to do these things just makes it worse. I tell people that Pilegesh is better than mamzerim, and that many rabbis permit forced marriages or no marriages for a woman with Kiddushin who wants to leave her husband even if that makes mamzerim. But these same “rabbis” may be against Pilegesh! And some people accept what I say because they know it is true. But if we start with these leniencies, I don’t know if people will tolerate it and it could bring Pilegesh crashing down chas vishalom, and then the mamzerim…


5) Would a women who married by pelegesh marriage and "divorced" be allowed to marry a kohen?

Answer: Rav Yaacov Emden quoted above says that a child from a Pilegesh marriage is כשרים כשאר מיוחסים בישראל. If so, I see no reason to forbid a Pilegesh woman from a Kohen. There were times when Kohanim made up higher standards for themselves than others, but I don’t know if today they do these things. Thus, such a question really belongs to the Kohen. Is he from such a group or family of Kohanim that feels denigrated by taking somebody who is not a Kohen or other such higher standards, and maybe, in that grouping, is a negation of Pilegesh. But if the Kohen himself has no such custom in his family, and the Yaavetz says as mentioned before that the child she will have from Pilegesh are like the מיוחסים בישראל I don’t see why there should be a problem. But again, this depends on whether the Cohanim themselves will accept this, and the one to ask is the husband she wants to marry, or perhaps a Rov who deals with Kohanim.


6  Why would there be a problem about a lady going to a regular mikvah? Who has to know if it is a marriage by kiddushin or by pelegesh marriage?

Answer: This is an area where the people who run the Mikva can make the rules. We had before about a Pilegesh marrying a Kohen. I said that some families of Kohanim have higher standards than the Shulchan Aruch about who they marry. The same is true about people who control the Mikva. They make up rules appropriate for their understanding. I was in Israel once talking to a Gadol HaDor and the Mikva lady came over and said that somebody wants to  use the Mikva, and it was a person that had a problem. The Rov thought a moment and then said let her enter. Yes, it is a mitsvah to go to the Mikva, but on the other hand, there may be, from the people running the Mikva, standards they feel are appropriate.
This is why it is important for people marrying with Pilegesh to work with a local Rov who will point out to them areas that could be a problem. A Mikva is one of these areas. Not because there is any kind of sin for a Pilegesh lady to go to the Mikva. This is clearly taught in the Shulchan Aruch beginning of laws of Kiddushin. If the Pilegesh goes to the Mikva, of course, they should do that. But the smart way is to have their supporting rabbi talk to those in charge of the Mikva so there won’t be problems. The case I mentioned above about a Gadol HaDor who was approached by the Mikva lady was also a case, as I recall, that the Rov was not satisfied that she had received the full education of something, but not to go to a Mikva, if so, that will be much worse. Of course, the proper thing is to make sure that such a lady gets the right teaching and training, like all Jewish ladies, and that should be the job of the Mikva people. Just to refuse somebody to enter a Mikva is not proper, because if somebody doesn’t know where to go to get lessons on Mikva, why not get somebody to teach them instead of expelling them?






7) Would this solve problems if a husband dies but it can't be proven, or he disappears, that the wife could somehow get remarried?

Answer: Yes, the wife could just declare that she breaks the marriage and what happened with the husband will in no way negate that. She is free to remarry.


8) Would this mean that the wife’s earning in a pelegesh marriage belongs to her?

Answer: A Pilegesh marriage is about two married people who have to work things out. Pilegesh does not have a Kesubo as Kiddushin does. It is a marriage, but that marriage is best organized in all of its aspects between the husband and wife. I spoke to a lady who married with Pilegesh and every year she sits with her husband and makes up a list of what to do that year with this or that. She has a wonderful marriage and has been blessed with fine children. But every year they sit down and discuss about next year and their goals.


Thank you very much for your really excellent questions. First of all, when somebody wants to know what the halacha is in a specific case, there are two kinds. One is a case, such as is a food kosher, or what we may do on Shabbos, which is something taught in many books easily available, and is well known to the various rabbis who work in these areas regularly. Then there is a question about Pilegesh. Who today is involved in these questions? There are here or there somebody married as a Pilegesh, but I don’t know how many rabbis are experts in the halacha of Pilegesh.

Second of all, when I suggest somebody marrying with Pilegesh, it is mainly because I have a terrible fear of Kiddushin. For most women, when the marriage sours, they will find a “rabbi” who will tell them to force a GET from their husband, and some of them, all over the world now, just tell a woman to leave with no GET! Children born from an invalid GET or surely from no GET are mamzerim. Thus, when I trumpet how important Pilegesh is, it is because most women today cannot be trusted to spend their whole lives with a husband they don’t like. People like that should not marry with Kiddushin in the first place. For them Pilegesh is preferable. Whenever she wants, she just leaves. And the gemora in Sanhedrin 21A, quoted by the Vilna Gaon in the beginning of the Laws of Kiddushin in Shulchan Aruch, clearly states that people may marry a Pilegesh without making Kiddushin.

Thus, I would not necessarily tell a woman who is positive she can maintain her life with a bad husband forever, with never violating the Torah and making an invalid GET or no GET, to marry not with Kiddushin but with Pilegesh. Having said that, another side of me says that today things are bad, and in ten years, they will be much worse, and in twenty years, very, very bad. That is what is happening today. If so, I would really be happy if no woman marries with Kiddushin, because who knows?

We have two major poskim who strongly suggest marrying with Pilegesh. One is the Ramban and the other is Reb Yaacov Emden, son of the Chacham Tsvi. The Ramban states clearly that Pilegesh is permitted, period. He even claims that the Rambam agreed with him if the Pilegesh marries as husband and wife, not zenuce chas vishalom.  The other person is Reb Yaacov Emden, who is very strong about encouraging Pilegesh, but for different reasons. He maintains that many people need the freedom to marry a Pilegesh, for various reasons. His approach is that Pilegesh can save many people from many terrible sins and problems.

My great fear today of women stuck in marriages done with Kiddushin is rooted in the reality that today major rabbis, the biggest names, are encouraging many women to remarry without a kosher GET and thus have children who are mamzerim. The count of mamzerim is going to rise more and more and the only hope is Pilegesh. Pilegesh is the only way to solve the problem of making mamzerim with invalid Gittin. Unless the husband dies